The Regulations came into effect on 14 January 2019 and create new tools to help brand owners enforce their rights. Those who don’t actively monitor their use of trademarks, or comply with intellectual property rights, could fall foul of new offences.
Registering a new company?
Previously, companies could defend their use of a registered mark if it featured in their own company name, but this defence will now only be available to natural persons. Companies who register a name featuring a registered mark, risk committing a separate offence under section 10(4)(ca) of the Act.
It is not enough to do a ‘Google search’ to see if someone else is using your intended company name. Before incorporation, you should search the Intellectual Property Office’s register to see if a mark has been registered in the UK, and consider instructing a trademark attorney who has access to European and worldwide trade mark registers with advanced search facilities.
Selling a business?
From 14 January 2019, a business transfer will include any registered trademarks unless these are excluded from the contract of sale, or there is a clear presumption the marks should not be included (section 24(1A) of the Act). Sellers need to ensure that their registered marks are properly accounted for in the purchase price, or exclude them from the sale to avoid transfer at an undervalue.
Involved in a supply chain?
There are new offences designed to combat counterfeiting. Parties are at risk of infringing trade mark rights where they are involved in labelling, packaging, adding security or authenticity features, stocking, importing, exporting or placing goods on the market, even if they do not actually sell those items (section 10(3B) of the Act).
Licensing rights to another party?
Previously, any licencee could bring an action for infringement, unless the terms of their licence prevented them from doing so. Under the new Regulations:
These provisions extend to trade mark applications as well as infringement actions, and reverse the previous, default position. Licensors can restrict or waive these rights to control proceedings by drafting the relevant permissions into the licence.
Both exclusive and sole licencees can also intervene in proceedings and seek compensation where an infringement has affected them (section 30(6A) of the Act), and if successful, the owner of the mark must hold those damages on behalf of the licensee.
It is important that licensors act when called upon to protect their marks, either by taking direct action or granting licensees permission to act on their behalf. Both parties should review their current licence agreements to determine whether the default powers need to be updated.
There are many other changes brought in by the regulations which impact collective marks, advertising, the use of agents and the type of trade marks that can be registered.
For more information, or to discuss your intellectual property strategy, please contact Emma Watt.
The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.