Providers need to be alive to the risk of contractors becoming insolvent and how to limit the resulting inevitable disruption.
You can read the paper here.
It is drafted on the basis of a “no deal” approach and assumes no access to European procurement markets for UK contractors. This clearly depends on the terms of the Brexit negotiations, the outcome of which it is too early to predict.
The approach proposed is based on transitional arrangements that have typically applied when new EU procurement Directives have been brought in.
In particular, it proposes that UK contracting authorities should have continued access to OJEU only for procurement procedures begun pre-Brexit and call-offs from framework agreements procured pre-Brexit. There are a number of problems with this approach:
- For projects supported by European funds, grant conditions often require all procurements to be via an OJEU process. Recipients of these grants will need to submit OJEU notices for these procurements before Brexit. It will be crucial to get these procurements right, since the option of discontinuing a flawed procurement process and starting again will no longer be available post Brexit;
- A number of procurement “tools” (such as the ability to use the e-certis database for selection documentation) that help UK companies tender for European public contracts will no longer be available;
- The UK will need to make alternative arrangements to replace OJEU advertising for new procurements begun on the day after Brexit, given that the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (which require an “OJEU process”) will be preserved in force by the Great Repeal Act (now rebadged as the EU (Withdrawal) Act); and
- The Commission is proposing that all of the current European legal remedies will continue to apply to procurements begun pre-Brexit. This will require the agreement of the UK Government, which seems currently to be saying that the European Court should have no role post Brexit. It will also mean giving EU contractors access to the UK courts to challenge UK procurements begun and, more controversially, call offs from UK frameworks procured, pre-Brexit.
The Commission’s approach means that the EU procurement rules will no longer apply to contracts procured pre-Brexit once they have been signed and a contract award notice published in relation to them. The Commission is proposing that the cut-off point for the application of those rules will be when the contract is “finalised” i.e. when the contract award notice is published or the procurement is discontinued. However, “substantial variations” to those contracts will still be able to be challenged in the UK courts because of the wording of Regulation 72 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, which prohibits variations which are not within the scope of that Regulation.
A lot more work will be needed to arrive at a practical and workable position in relation to EU procurement post Brexit. The Commission’s proposals are their opening gambit in these negotiations.
For more information
Please contact Andrew Millross.
Housing associations must continue to deliver core functions effectively and compliantly notwithstanding the uncertainty over the standards to which you will be held in the future.
Over the last few years the meaning of “asset management” has changed from being all about repairs to understanding that assets might not stay in an organisation forever.
The Grenfell Tower tragedy has understandably prompted a fundamental reconsideration of how building safety is approached for High-Rise Residential Buildings.
Results from the latest three-yearly valuation of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) are starting to trickle through.
The potential for Brexit with or without a deal causes uncertainty, and credit rating agencies do not like uncertainty.
Let’s face it, Wills are underappreciated and often overlooked. In fact, around 54% of the British public do not have one!
A recent case throws light on the scope of the exemption for “land transactions” from the need for an OJEU tender process.
A leaked report into maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust revealed by The Independent has been described as the “largest maternity scandal in NHS history”.
The Pensions Regulator is showing its determination to improve the prudent management of Local Government Pension funds by digging deep into the internal workings of these funds.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.