We summarise the outcome of the High Court case ruling against Kingston-upon-Thames RBC and which landlords may need to take action and when, regarding compensation for overcharging water bills.
On 31 July, the consultation period ended on the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)’s proposals for reforming the building safety regulatory system set out in the 'Building a Safer Future' document.
During the consultation period, we have seen a change of Prime Minister and a potential shift in emphasis towards new build. It is not clear yet whether the new government will be as committed to implementing the proposals being consulted on as Theresa May’s government said it was.
We thought it was important to add our voice to those calling for change by responding to the consultation. Many of the questions were “technical”, so our response focussed just on those areas where we thought we could make a useful contribution from our perspective as lawyers specialising in registered provider and local authority housing work.
Our response is available to read here.
Particular things we highlighted were:
- the need for any duties expressed in “outcome-based” terms to be accompanied by clear guidance and “worked examples”;
- the importance of clarity over the respective roles of the Health and Safety Executive and any new building safety regulator during the construction process;
- a call for the Government to act transparently in relation to fire safety issues, including publishing the full test reports from their fire door test programme, and early publication of the outcomes of the ongoing testing of non-Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding materials;
- the tension between the drive for “value-for-money” (particularly for local authorities that have faced severe budget cuts in recent years) and the desire of responsible landlords to specify better quality, and therefore potentially higher priced, materials (as highlighted by Dame Judith’s criticisms of “value engineering” in her review);
- how restrictions on specifying particular products or technical standards in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can make it harder to specify that good quality products must be used in building construction or refurbishment;
- the “disconnect” between procurement processes under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and the leaseholder consultation provisions under the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003;
- the practical difficulties over how a duty on residents to “cooperate” with the person accountable for building safety can be enforced;
- the need for Government to meet the costs of any safety works that are not to be recharged to leaseholders, otherwise those costs will, in practice, fall on a registered provider’s or local authority’s tenants; and
- the need for legislation to underpin the new arrangements.
If you would like more information in relation to the consultation or our response, please contact Andrew Millross.
It is important to remember that when it comes to selling services, you must deliver on your promises.
Under section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA) 1974, organisations are obligated to avoid public health and safety risks through the conduct of their business.
How does a media-savvy employer ensure a season of festive cheer but without mishap, damage to their reputation or harassment and bullying claims?
Providers need to be alive to the risk of contractors becoming insolvent and how to limit the resulting inevitable disruption.
Housing associations must continue to deliver core functions effectively and compliantly notwithstanding the uncertainty over the standards to which you will be held in the future.
Over the last few years the meaning of “asset management” has changed from being all about repairs to understanding that assets might not stay in an organisation forever.
The Grenfell Tower tragedy has understandably prompted a fundamental reconsideration of how building safety is approached for High-Rise Residential Buildings.
Results from the latest three-yearly valuation of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) are starting to trickle through.
The potential for Brexit with or without a deal causes uncertainty, and credit rating agencies do not like uncertainty.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.