As the tight grip of lockdown eases across the country, the Government is producing swathes of guidance as to how this will look in practice.
On 31 July, the consultation period ended on the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)’s proposals for reforming the building safety regulatory system set out in the 'Building a Safer Future' document.
During the consultation period, we have seen a change of Prime Minister and a potential shift in emphasis towards new build. It is not clear yet whether the new government will be as committed to implementing the proposals being consulted on as Theresa May’s government said it was.
We thought it was important to add our voice to those calling for change by responding to the consultation. Many of the questions were “technical”, so our response focussed just on those areas where we thought we could make a useful contribution from our perspective as lawyers specialising in registered provider and local authority housing work.
Our response is available to read here.
Particular things we highlighted were:
- the need for any duties expressed in “outcome-based” terms to be accompanied by clear guidance and “worked examples”;
- the importance of clarity over the respective roles of the Health and Safety Executive and any new building safety regulator during the construction process;
- a call for the Government to act transparently in relation to fire safety issues, including publishing the full test reports from their fire door test programme, and early publication of the outcomes of the ongoing testing of non-Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding materials;
- the tension between the drive for “value-for-money” (particularly for local authorities that have faced severe budget cuts in recent years) and the desire of responsible landlords to specify better quality, and therefore potentially higher priced, materials (as highlighted by Dame Judith’s criticisms of “value engineering” in her review);
- how restrictions on specifying particular products or technical standards in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can make it harder to specify that good quality products must be used in building construction or refurbishment;
- the “disconnect” between procurement processes under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and the leaseholder consultation provisions under the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003;
- the practical difficulties over how a duty on residents to “cooperate” with the person accountable for building safety can be enforced;
- the need for Government to meet the costs of any safety works that are not to be recharged to leaseholders, otherwise those costs will, in practice, fall on a registered provider’s or local authority’s tenants; and
- the need for legislation to underpin the new arrangements.
If you would like more information in relation to the consultation or our response, please contact Andrew Millross.
As the Government continues to relax social distancing requirements, many charities have found the easing of lockdown as difficult to manage as going into lockdown.
We know that from 1 August 2020, the Government will “pause” shielding.
In the first of a series of podcasts, David Alcock and Beulah Allaway from ACS talk to Chris Brown from igloo regeneration about business, social purpose and why being an ethical developer is unusual.
Catch up with all the latest charity updates in this week’s news round-up.
The Government has announced its intention to lift the shielding requirement for extremely vulnerable people. Katherine Sinclair and Libby Hubbard discuss...
The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 has now received Royal Assent. It applies to most companies as well as Limited Liability Partnerships.
The latest development in the long history of sodium valproate was the publication of The Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review today
Failure to provide minimum pension contribution protection following a TUPE transfer can end up costing a lot more than if provision had been made.
More than 700 people were consulted about their experiences of pelvic mesh, Primodos and an epilepsy drug called Sodium Valproate.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.