Until now, strict conditions stated that an application for a parental order - which establishes the legal parents of the child - must be made within six months of the child’s birth.
In the case of child K today, the judge decided to use discretion to extend this time limit, making it more possible in future for couples to gain their status as legal parents outside the six-month time limit.
As head of the team representing child K, ACS’s children’s law specialist Jas Tamber explained that the significance of this judgement is far reaching.
He said: “Overseas surrogacy for UK couples involves complicated issues of international family law, which in many cases does not reflect the reality of the circumstances.
“A growing number of UK couples are seeking to create a family by making overseas surrogacy arrangements, often without the benefit of legal advice and any understanding of the difficulties that can arise.
“An order has the transformative effect of making a couple the legal parents of a child and removes surrogates rights.”
The result of today’s ruling means that in some circumstances it may be possible for parents to apply for a parental order after the six months’ limitation.
Mr Tamber continued: “The Court should be able to use this discretion in the cases of surrogate children whose parents have not already applied for parental orders.
“For example, this new ruling may apply to families who had children some time ago and are not aware that parental orders exist, where immigration issues have led to delays or that intended parents are simply not aware of the time limit rules.”
Given the exceptional and unusual aspects of child K’s situation, ACS instructed leading barrister Elizabeth Isaacs QC of St Ives Chambers to represent the child in court when the case was transferred to the President of the Family Division of the High Court of Justice in England and Wales.
Miss Isaacs is known for her expertise in complex care proceedings. She said: “This case is ground-breaking and has far-reaching implications for all areas of child law because not only does it extend the time limit for applying for parental orders, but it also affects how courts should interpret what may appear to be fixed legal time limits or definitions.”
This case sends a loud and clear message to encourage parental order applications to be made and promptly, urged Mr Tamber.
He added: “The legal relationship in this jurisdiction between children born as a result of international surrogacy arrangements and their intended parents is not on a secure legal footing without such an order being made.
“This can have long term legal consequences for the children and those who care for them.”
Rated by their peers and clients, the children and family law team at ACS are top-tier (West Midlands) recommended in Legal 500. They have five specialist panel lawyers and are regularly involved in critical and complex cases referred by CAFCASS, other law firms and the judiciary.
The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.