Campaigners have argued that changes being made to care worker arrangements at Botton Village, a community for people with learning disabilities in Yorkshire, breached human rights.
The case centred on the steps the charity was taking to meet HM Revenue and Customs requirement that 'co-workers', who have historically provided much of the care in Botton Village in shared living arrangements, be treated as employees. These workers had previously benefitted from an agreement by which they paid no tax on the considerable benefits they received.
A number of co-workers refused both the charity’s offer of an employment contract and its authority over the provision of support to the people with learning disabilities. As a result, the charity sought to introduce replacement employed care staff but this was halted on 13 March when the High Court granted interim relief preventing the charity from taking action. That order has now been varied on 25 March when permission for the judicial review was refused.
Helen Tucker of Anthony Collins Solicitors, the specialist law firm appointed by the charity, said:
“As a charity, Camphill Village Trust seeks to avoid legal disputes where possible. In this instance, the charity trustees had no option but to respond urgently to the claim brought against them.
The Court decided that the claim was “unarguable” as the charity had made an “evaluative decision” as to how it could most effectively meet its obligations to the learning disabled people it supports. This came as a relief to our client and a vindication of the work being done by the charity’s staff and trustees. They are working hard to ensure the charity meets all regulatory requirements in a way that meets the needs of the people it works with.”
The matter returns to court on 15th April, as the residents' solicitors have issued a renewed application for permission.
Please contact Kate Granger
The Electrical Safety Standards in the Private Rented Sector (England) Regulations 2020 will apply to all new specified tenancies from 1 July 2020 and all existing tenancies from 1 April 2021.
We've been producing ebriefings and advice about covid-19 where we can, and we've issued a lot this week. If you've missed any, we've compiled them here.
Late last night (26 March) the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) issued a guidance note regarding Court Service.
What is the correct approach for contracting authorities to adopt during these times, to navigate effectively the urgency of the situation alongside the legal duties on public sector organisations?
As some of us bemoan the withdrawal of one daily episode of the Archers, it is a reminder that no industry will be untouched by the Coronavirus and its effects. The pensions industry is no exception.
In this our third Coronavirus briefing, we will address the latest employment developments and their implications for employers and employees.
The Charity Commission has issued two guidance notes reassuring charities of its flexible and pragmatic approach at this uncertain time.
During this period of uncertainty, many of you are unsure as to how the new government measures will affect respective parents spending time with their children.
Last week, the Lord Chancellor approved the issue of the Pilot Practice Direction, which affects the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal (mental health).
Employers should not undervalue the risks that lone working can pose to the health and safety of its employees.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.