The European Court has upheld the long-standing principle that parties to a dispute should be able to choose their lawyers without having to go through a tender process (or use a framework).
Generally speaking, anyone who is under 18 cannot make a will. The one exception is if that person is a member of the Armed Forces where separate rules apply.
The recent case of CJF has highlighted another situation where it may be possible to make "a will". In this particular set of circumstances, the will took the format of a settlement/trust document.
CJF had been born in 2005 and suffered severe neurological disabilities following complications at birth. A successful clinical negligence claim was made resulting in a lump sum damages award.
CJF’s father denied paternity and played no part in his life. His mother had looked after him during his early years but he was subsequently taken into foster care partly owing to the permanent damage to his mother's health because of the complicated birth.
A property was purchased and adapted for CJF’s needs following the settlement in which C JF and his foster carers and their two daughters lived.
CJF became terminally ill whilst still under the age of 18. The intestacy provisions would mean that his estate, which included the property valued at about £350,000, together with a further £310,000 would pass equally between his mother and his father. Nothing would pass to the foster carers who had very limited personal means themselves, meaning they would be unable to purchase the property from the estate.
An emergency application was made to the court who authorised the creation of a settlement enabling the foster family to keep the property, outright and free of tax, with the inheritance tax coming out of residue and the balance then passing to CJF’s mother.
The order does not set out the terms of the settlement but, presumably, there were no inheritance tax capital gains tax implications of creation of the settlement, taking advantage of the disabled trust regime.
Whilst an IPFDA claim might have been possible in the case, it was clearly preferable to resolve everything before CJF passed away, for a quicker and less stressful solution for all concerned.
The case provides an example of a flexible approach by the Court of Protection to a complex set of circumstances which could otherwise have resulted in particular unfairness. It is reminiscent of the earlier case of Bouette v Rose where a mother had to make a claim, following the death of her minor daughter who had received a damages award, under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 to be entitled to the whole of the estate as she had had the sole carer of her daughter during her lifetime – the father having been absent for most of the child's life. The father was entitled to a one half share under the intestacy rules.
For more information
Please contact Donna Holmes.
On 8 July, news broke of the staggering fine of more than £183m the ICO intended to levy against British Airways as a result of a hack that took place in 2018, compromising 500,000 customers' data.
The Government has been refused permission to appeal a decision ruling that transitional arrangements in public sector pension schemes are discriminatory.
The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
Many local authorities have assessed that a trading subsidiary or trading structure could be beneficial as part of generating income or the service delivery matrix.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
The Government has resurrected its plans to cap the termination payments for exiting employees in the public sector.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.