The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
In R (on the application of DA) and Others v SSWP  EWHC 1446 (Admin), a challenge was raised by a number of claimants who were (or would be) affected by the benefit cap. Each claimant was a lone parent of a child under two-years-old.
Until such claimants work 16 hours or more, they are subject to the benefit cap. They argued that this position was unlawful because it unfairly discriminated against them: the cost of childcare for children under the age of two is expensive and limited in availability, meaning that it was difficult for them to go back to work and/or to afford the childcare to go back to work.
The High Court agreed with the claimants and held:
- The exceptions to the benefit cap did not consider the adverse effects on lone parents with children under two;
- It was highly likely lone parents will not be able to work 16 hours and/or arrange sufficient childcare;
- The benefit cap failed to apply the best interests of a child under two-years-old; and
- There was no reasonable justification for the cap. Although there was reasoning behind the DWP’s approach (i.e. work incentive echoing the whole welfare reform programme), on this occasion the justification was not proportionate to the aims of the cap; the potential consequences would be more harmful than being in a workless household.
At this time there is no change in the legal position. The DWP has announced that it will continue to apply the benefit cap to lone parents of children under two and in the meantime will appeal the decision of the High Court.
For landlords with tenants who are in this position, ensure they are fully encouraged to make an application for discretionary housing payments, as recommended by the DWP.
Child Tax Credits and Universal Credit – Two-child limit
RP landlords are likely to increasingly experience the effect of ‘two-child limit’ on payments to claimants of Child Tax Credits or the child element of Universal Credit.
Claimants with children can apply for the child element of Universal Credit. Those not yet claiming Universal Credit (either in full or in part) will instead be eligible for Child Tax Credits. Those payments will now generally be restricted to two children, for those households where a child was or is born after 6 April 2017; previously there has been no limit.
There are a number of exceptions to this new rule including where the child:
- was born as part of a multiple birth;
- was adopted from local authority care;
- is in the claimant’s care (formally or informally) and would otherwise be looked after by the local authority; or
- was conceived as a result of a non-consensual sexual act (including rape) or in a controlling or coercive relationship.
The Universal Credit payment system is currently unable to process a claim limiting the amount of child element to two children (it is expected that the payment system will be able to calculate such claims from November 2018). Those claimants currently receiving Universal Credit for more than two children will continue to receive the same amount (unless there is a change of circumstance).
If a new Universal Credit claimant is responsible for three children, they are expected to claim individual benefits as per the previous welfare regime. They will be able to claim Universal Credit once the payment system can account for the change (but will only receive the child element for two). The amount of Child Tax Credits (and other means-tested benefits that they claim) will be limited to including a two-child limit for the relevant applicable amounts.
Whilst not directly linked to Housing Benefit or the housing element of Universal Credit, this change will, of course, impact upon the overall income available to those tenants of RPs claiming contributions. That overall income may affect their ability to pay rent payments due, particularly in a regime of direct payments under Universal Credit and taking into account delays in processing claims.
If you have customers that are (or will be) affected by the two-child limit, CPAG is looking for test cases to challenge the lawfulness of the policy.
For more information
For more information or assistance about welfare benefits, including these updates, please contact Zishaan Saleem.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.