The Academies Financial Handbook is updated annually by the Department for Education and the Education and Skills Funding Agency; it contains a number of governance requirements for academy trusts.
With news breaking that the use of video remote witnessing of Wills will become law – and backdated for Wills signed from 31 January 2020 – some people may be breathing a sigh of relief that emergency actions they had to take during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, especially for those needing to shield, will be legally valid.
For others, the prospect of remote witnessing of their Wills going forward offers a new and potentially quicker and easier way for them to get their Will in place – especially for busy people, and with continued social distancing.
Whilst the news that the law is looking to modernise and move to recognise the opportunities of our increasingly tech-savvy world is to be welcomed, the risks also need to be considered.
The risks of remote witnessing
The main downside of a remote witnessing situation is that as an adviser or other observer, including a witness to the Will, you can only confirm what you can actually see, which will be limited to your screen and the camera angle and scope of the video feed. You cannot see the whole room and you cannot see what – or, more particularly, who – might be behind the screen.
For a Will to be valid, the person making the Will (the Testator) must be over 18, have the relevant mental capacity to make a Will (known as Testamentary Capacity) and the Will must be in writing and signed by the Testator in the presence of two independent witnesses who do not (and whose spouses do not) benefit from the contents of the Will. Whilst this process provides legal validity, Wills can be challenged on a number of grounds by disappointed beneficiaries who feel they should have been included or have received more than the Will provides.
Grounds for challenge include allegations that a Testator did not understand or approve the contents of a Will, or that they were subject to undue influence from a third party in the preparation of their Will. Whilst remote witnessing abilities will enable a Testator’s capacity and their understanding of the Will to be assessed, the limitations of video conferencing’s ability to confirm categorically that no one else was present – and that the testator was, therefore, making the Will in the absence of pressure or ‘support’ in setting out their understanding – is necessarily limited, and as a result, may be open to challenge.
The future for Will signing
The new rules are to be welcomed, but it appears sensible that, wherever possible, the current in-person signature rules continue to be followed and, if the remote witnessing rules are required for an emergency situation, it would be sensible for a Will to be re-signed in the physical presence of two witnesses as soon as the emergency situation to best protect the full implementation of a Testator’s wishes. This will enable witnesses to give a much fuller account of the circumstances of the signature of the Will – including whether anyone else was present or not – and may alleviate concerns or allegations. This will be particularly beneficial for Testators with more complex circumstances, where they may be looking to exclude a family member from benefiting or making substantial changes to previous Wills.
For more information
If you would like advice about the preparation of your Will or how the new rules might affect you, please contact Donna Holmes.
Supreme Court publishes key decision for those working in the UK’s gig economy.
The 'Chocolate Snowman Appeal' is an amazing initiative that Anthony Collins Solicitors' (ACS) employees take part in every year.
The Building Safety Bill (the Bill) is said to be the most significant and wide-ranging change to the regulatory environment for higher risk building (HRBs) for over 45 years.
On 4 November 2020, the Restriction of Public Exit Payments Regulations 2020 (the Regulations) came into force; exit payments for the public sector were capped at £95,000.
The case was brought by the Official Receiver who sought disqualification orders under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) against the seven trustees of Kids Company and its CEO. It illustrates well the tension between the role of a fulltime paid CEO of a large charity and the role of its board as voluntary trustees/directors.
At the end of 2020, The Charity Governance Code was updated or 'refreshed' as it is termed on its website.
Anthony Collins Solicitors is today (Thursday 11 February) revealing the scale of its social impact during 2020.
In their first podcast of this series, current and future trainees will discuss their journey and route to securing a training contract at Anthony Collins Solicitors.
A recent prosecution by the Health and Safety Executive ("HSE") demonstrates the importance of organisations regularly inspecting, maintaining, and if necessary, repairing or replacing street furnitur
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.