The Charity Commission (the Commission) has now issued its report and, interestingly, has concluded that the charity’s trustees acted in good faith and in what they honestly considered to be the charity’s best interests. Most trustees would consider this to be sufficient – what more could be asked of them? – but, in the world of charity governance, honesty and good faith are not the only requirements.
As well as being honest, trustees must act with reasonable skill and care when making decisions about a charity. They must consider the impact of their decisions on the charity’s reputation, beneficiaries and assets etc. A trustee might act honestly and in good faith but still deemed to have fallen short of the required standard of care.
In the case of the Presidents Club Charitable Trust, the Commission concluded that the trustees failed to:
Whilst, at this stage, the case has not resulted in any personal liability for those trustees, if such actions did result in a loss to the charity, there is potential for trustees to be liable to repay this loss from their personal funds. This is regardless of whether a charity is corporate (a charitable company or a charitable incorporated organisation) or unincorporated (for example, a trust).
Taking another example, if trustees decide to invest the charity’s money without the appropriate independent professional investment advice, resulting in serious loss to the charity, then the trustees' honesty and good faith will not stop them from being personally liable to repay that money to the charity (if they could not recover it) from their personal funds.
The lesson here is that good faith and honesty are not sufficient for charity trustees. They need to be aware of all their duties as trustees and how to act with reasonable skill and care while running the charity. It is important for trustees to look at their charity and its specific circumstances to consider how best to manage the risks.
We regularly provide interactive training for charity trustees with case studies based on the specific circumstances of their charity. If this would be of interest, please do not hesitate to contact Edwina Turner.
The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.