The Charity Commission (the Commission) has now issued its report and, interestingly, has concluded that the charity’s trustees acted in good faith and in what they honestly considered to be the charity’s best interests. Most trustees would consider this to be sufficient – what more could be asked of them? – but, in the world of charity governance, honesty and good faith are not the only requirements.
As well as being honest, trustees must act with reasonable skill and care when making decisions about a charity. They must consider the impact of their decisions on the charity’s reputation, beneficiaries and assets etc. A trustee might act honestly and in good faith but still deemed to have fallen short of the required standard of care.
In the case of the Presidents Club Charitable Trust, the Commission concluded that the trustees failed to:
Whilst, at this stage, the case has not resulted in any personal liability for those trustees, if such actions did result in a loss to the charity, there is potential for trustees to be liable to repay this loss from their personal funds. This is regardless of whether a charity is corporate (a charitable company or a charitable incorporated organisation) or unincorporated (for example, a trust).
Taking another example, if trustees decide to invest the charity’s money without the appropriate independent professional investment advice, resulting in serious loss to the charity, then the trustees' honesty and good faith will not stop them from being personally liable to repay that money to the charity (if they could not recover it) from their personal funds.
The lesson here is that good faith and honesty are not sufficient for charity trustees. They need to be aware of all their duties as trustees and how to act with reasonable skill and care while running the charity. It is important for trustees to look at their charity and its specific circumstances to consider how best to manage the risks.
We regularly provide interactive training for charity trustees with case studies based on the specific circumstances of their charity. If this would be of interest, please do not hesitate to contact Edwina Turner.
How does a media-savvy employer ensure a season of festive cheer but without mishap, damage to their reputation or harassment and bullying claims?
Providers need to be alive to the risk of contractors becoming insolvent and how to limit the resulting inevitable disruption.
Housing associations must continue to deliver core functions effectively and compliantly notwithstanding the uncertainty over the standards to which you will be held in the future.
Over the last few years the meaning of “asset management” has changed from being all about repairs to understanding that assets might not stay in an organisation forever.
The Grenfell Tower tragedy has understandably prompted a fundamental reconsideration of how building safety is approached for High-Rise Residential Buildings.
Results from the latest three-yearly valuation of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) are starting to trickle through.
The potential for Brexit with or without a deal causes uncertainty, and credit rating agencies do not like uncertainty.
Let’s face it, Wills are underappreciated and often overlooked. In fact, around 54% of the British public do not have one!
A recent case throws light on the scope of the exemption for “land transactions” from the need for an OJEU tender process.
A leaked report into maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust revealed by The Independent has been described as the “largest maternity scandal in NHS history”.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.