Looking back, I see that I have written articles about Sodium Valproate in 2017, 2018 and 2019. To be writing another article today carries mixed emotions: on the one hand satisfaction that this report recognises the errors that have been made and the enormous impact on women and families; but on the other hand it is upsetting to read that some people are still inappropriately prescribed sodium valproate, despite everything that is known about it and the risk of causing avoidable harm.
The ‘First Do No Harm report addresses three medical interventions: sodium valproate, Primodos (a hormone pregnancy test) and pelvic mesh. My colleague, Rankeshwar Batta, has written an article about the report.
The report gathered people’s experiences of sodium valproate and made major recommendations for change to reduce the risk of harm in the future and support to those who have already suffered harm.
In respect of sodium valproate, the report states “We believe that it has taken far too long for serious action to be taken to reduce the number of women who take sodium valproate during pregnancy while unaware of the risk. Women were not given the information they needed to make an informed choice, and despite the efforts of the valproate toolkit and the PPP, too many women still do not have this information.”
Two of the recommendations in respect of sodium valproate are:
On top of the historic and ongoing problems with sodium valproate, the report also identified inadequacies in regulating and monitoring new anti-epileptic drugs. Leading experts and patients raised concerns that the long-term outcomes of the newer generation drugs are unknown. The report recommended a registry for all women on anti-epileptic drugs who become pregnant.
In my work I have spoken with people who were prescribed and still are prescribed sodium valproate. I have heard about the effects it has had on them, their children and even concerns that it might have harmed their grandchildren. As a team we have a wealth of experience working with families of children who have suffered harm resulting in disability from birth. Having seen this from personal experience, I fully support the recommendations in the First Do No Harm report and hope it will improve patient care for other women on anti-epileptic medication in the future.
If you have any questions relating to this e-briefing or epilepsy care, please contact Ann Houghton who will be happy to speak to you on an initial free, no obligation basis.
Epilepsy Society offers a confidential helpline which provides information and emotional support for anyone affected by epilepsy:
01494 601 400 and helpline@epilepsysociety.org.uk
This ebriefing considers the Government’s proposals for challenges, as set out in Chapter 7 of the Green Paper entitled 'Fast and fair challenges'.
The Law Commission published its report on Technical Issues in Charity Law in September 2017 following a public consultation.
Changing charitable purposes and amending governing documents.
One of the stated aims of the Green Paper is “to deliver the best commercial outcomes with the least burden on the public sector".
The proposals concerning dynamic purchasing systems (DPS) and framework agreements are the most disappointing aspect of the Green Paper.
Family team partner, Elizabeth Wyatt, is delighted to congratulate Kadie Bennett for attaining Resolution Specialist Accreditation in both children law - private and complex financial remedy matters.
On 11 February 2021, the Pension Schemes Act 2021 was given royal assent, setting out a framework for several major changes that will certainly be of interest to employers and pension funds alike.
Matthew Wort, partner, speaks on today’s Supreme Court judgment for sleep-in shifts.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.