What are the issues?
Frustration continues for care providers, individuals deprived of their liberty and their families, with the challenges of administering the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (“DoLS”). The provisions are intended to legally protect anyone in receipt of care and treatment deprived of their liberty, in a hospital or care home.
DoLS were described by the House of Lords Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (“MCA”) as “frequently not used…leaving individuals without the safeguards parliament intended” and ultimately “not fit for purpose”.
The situation is even more complex when a person is deprived of their liberty in another setting (their own home, supported living, extra care, shared lives schemes) or is under 18 years of age. In these circumstances, an application must be made to the Court of Protection for a court order authorising the arrangements.
The proposed solution
The Law Commission was tasked with undertaking a complete review of the relevant legislation, and the design of a scheme that is understandable, straightforward to administer, and provides meaningful benefit for the individual concerned, whilst not overburdening providers and statutory authorities with unnecessary bureaucracy and expense. The Commission published its report and a draft bill back in March 2017. The report set out 47 recommendations that covered not only deprivation of liberty, but also reforms to improve MCA decision-making in general. The draft bill replaced DoLS in their entirety, with a new scheme and a new name; Liberty Protection Safeguards ("LPS").
The Joint Committee on Human Rights then undertook an inquiry into the need for reform. Their report, published in June 2018, concluded:
“The Law Commission’s proposals could form the basis of a better scheme for authorising deprivations of liberty, directing scrutiny to those who need it most. That scheme should be implemented urgently”.
Today's News
The new Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill published earlier this week.
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2017-2019/0117/18117.pdf
Explanatory notes will follow.
The Law Commissioner Nicholas Paines QC has said:
“This new legislation, based broadly on our recommendations, will go a long way towards addressing the flaws of the current system and better protect the most vulnerable in our society.”
However, it is clear to see that this bill is very much a watered-down version of the draft produced by the Commission, focusing solely on a new LPS scheme.
The key points
Applicability
LPS will apply where a person:
The new LPS scheme is not limited to care homes and hospitals. It will apply to people being deprived of their liberty in their own homes, or in supported living, etc. (Individuals who are subject to “mental health arrangements”, being treated under the provisions of mental health legislation, are excluded from the scheme).
Responsibilities on care homes
In a care home, greater responsibilities are placed on the manager, as part of the LPS authorisation:
The manager must (inter alia):
In other non-hospital settings, such as the person’s own home, the responsible authority is responsible for these investigations.
Other key points:
Local authorities will, no doubt, welcome the provisions in this draft bill. Where the person is in a care home, the authority would be able to offload a significant amount of preliminary investigation work to the management of the care home. If the person is in hospital, the hospital management is responsible for the scheme.
Care home managers may be left shaking their heads.
The first reading of the bill was in the House of Lords yesterday. This fledgling piece of legislation has a long way to go. It will face a great deal of scrutiny, amendments and then further scrutiny on its journey. It is far too early for care providers to “worry”. However, their representative bodies will wish to lobby and otherwise engage with the parliamentary process as opportunities arise, to ensure the eventual Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act does not impose an unfair burden on the sector.
If you have any questions about the issues raised in this article, get in touch with Sheree Green.
The Academies Financial Handbook is updated annually by the Department for Education and the Education and Skills Funding Agency; it contains a number of governance requirements for academy trusts.
Supreme Court publishes key decision for those working in the UK’s gig economy.
The 'Chocolate Snowman Appeal' is an amazing initiative that Anthony Collins Solicitors' (ACS) employees take part in every year.
The Building Safety Bill (the Bill) is said to be the most significant and wide-ranging change to the regulatory environment for higher risk building (HRBs) for over 45 years.
On 4 November 2020, the Restriction of Public Exit Payments Regulations 2020 (the Regulations) came into force; exit payments for the public sector were capped at £95,000.
The case was brought by the Official Receiver who sought disqualification orders under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) against the seven trustees of Kids Company and its CEO. It illustrates well the tension between the role of a fulltime paid CEO of a large charity and the role of its board as voluntary trustees/directors.
At the end of 2020, The Charity Governance Code was updated or 'refreshed' as it is termed on its website.
Anthony Collins Solicitors is today (Thursday 11 February) revealing the scale of its social impact during 2020.
In their first podcast of this series, current and future trainees will discuss their journey and route to securing a training contract at Anthony Collins Solicitors.
A recent prosecution by the Health and Safety Executive ("HSE") demonstrates the importance of organisations regularly inspecting, maintaining, and if necessary, repairing or replacing street furnitur
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.