The Johnny Depp -v- News Group Newspapers trial concluded last week and has been widely publicised and reported on around the World.
Take Mr M, for example – Mr M was a tenant board member of his local housing association. Mr M, being a community-minded man, got involved in supporting the vulnerable elderly couple down the road. He would take them shopping and sort out their Sky subscription. However, with the couple concerned being barely literate, he was also taking a “percentage” on top of the subscription, without, of course, their knowing …
Or take Ms O – a well-known activist who ended up on the board of a charitable company leading a community regeneration project on her “patch”. Ms O was a vocal, strong-minded person, who made her views clear, but had a reputation for being fair and robust – until one day in a board meeting she overstepped the mark and used clearly racist language.
The conduct of volunteers in any organisation, even at senior board member level, can fall short in a wide variety of ways, often not as obvious as those set out above. Over the years, Anthony Collins Solicitors has had to deal with board member issues for consumer co-operatives, housing associations, social enterprises and charities, and there are a few (perhaps obvious) useful truths which apply in any such situation.
First, at some point when you are not in the midst of a dispute, review your rules to make sure there is clear provision for the removal of board members for misconduct. Not all rules contain such provisions, and not all such provisions are clear. Ideally, make sure that if the allegations are serious there is the ability to suspend the board member (or members) concerned – there is some doubt, certainly for limited companies, about whether a board member can be legitimately suspended unless there is a clear power in the rules to do it.
Secondly – and, again, not in the heat of the moment – at least consider having a procedure for dealing with complaints about the conduct of board members. This could look something like the following:
- notify (and, if necessary, suspend) the board member concerned – unless matters are so serious that you need to involve the police
- investigate any allegations – with independent support if needed, and give the board member concerned the opportunity to put their across side of the story as part of that process
- present the findings to a decision maker (the chair, a standards committee, or even the full board) who have not been involved in the process up to that point; again, give the board member concerned the right to put their case forward
- have a range of sanctions, from a simple warning up to permanent removal from the board
- give a right of appeal to the full board (or the membership, depending on your rules).
Think about having a board code of conduct if you don’t have one already. Educate your board as to what they should expect of each other. Talk about how people behave in meetings, what they disclose outside and how they talk to staff. Help board members be clear about their role.
Thirdly, if and when an issue about board member conduct arises, use the procedure. If you have an agreed process, keep to it. There are court cases which say any decision your organisation purports to make could be invalid – not because the decision was wrong (necessarily), but because you didn’t do what you said you were going to do.
Above all, don’t:
- panic (it’s all happened before, somewhere)
- insist on sacking a board member immediately, before any investigation
- get drawn into a slanging match
- cut corners during the process.
Dealing with board member misconduct is no fun, and it can be a drain on time, funds, and energy – but it needn’t be the end of the world if it is handled properly, and it can be even be a learning experience for those involved.
For more information
This artice was first written for Co-operative News, issued 24th April 2014.
Six months after the first recorded case of COVID-19 in the UK, it is clear that charities, community organisations and volunteers have played a huge role in the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic
This article is further to our previous e-briefing (published on 22 July 2020) where we informed you that there are new temporary measures (a new Practice Direction PD55c) that have been brought into deal with possession claims, following the stay being lifted on possession claims on 22 August 2020.
A podcast from Alex Loxton and Sumi Begum from our housing litigation team, discussing injunction applications and the courts approach in light of COVID-19 and the ban on possession proceedings.
We have asked colleagues in the Employment Law team to highlight what they think is key to managing a redundancy programme well.
The use of video remote witnessing of Wills will become law.
There’s no doubt about it, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed incredible pressure on the NHS.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s £3.8 billion SDLT giveaway may bring benefits for registered providers of social housing, according to ACS experts in the sector.
We finally have some detail about what will happen after the end of the possession stay/evictions ban on 23 August 2020.
On 15 July 2020, the Prime Minister committed to an Independent Inquiry into the handling of the coronavirus pandemic.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.