R (on the application of MT) v Oxford City Council

The Claimant (“MT”) had a mental disability that meant he was unable to manage his property and financial affairs. MT had been living at home and was being cared for by his family. The family became unable to provide this care and in October 2011 MT applied to be placed on the Local Authority’s housing register. The application was rejected on the basis that the Local Authority had no duty under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996 (“the 1996 Act”) because MT did not have the capacity to make the application. The Local Authority relied on the House of Lords case of R v Oldham MBC ex parte Garlick [1993] where it was held that an applicant had to be capable of accepting or rejecting an offer of accommodation.

MT applied for judicial review submitting that the Local Authority’s decision was inconsistent with Article 14 ECHR.  MT also argued that the decision in Garlick was no longer good law because it was discriminatory towards those who lack capacity, contrary to Article 14 of the ECHR, when read together with Article 8 (a right to respect for private and family life).

The application was refused and the decision in Garlick was held to be determinative. The High Court noted that the 1996 Act was implicit in its provisions that accommodation was only available to those who had capacity to accept an offer.  The High Court held that MT was not being refused public housing and was only being refused as an applicant for housing as homeless under the part 7 of the 1996 Act. He could still be assessed under the National Assistance Act 1948.

Comment

Although the High Court has refused permission to appeal, it will be interesting to see if a further application to appeal is made, as this decision raises some questions about the limited routes into housing for persons deemed to be lacking capacity.

For more information

Should you wish to discuss the implications of this case further please contact Helen Tucker on 0121 212 7459, helen.tucker@anthonycollins.com or Rose Klemperer on 0121 214 3504, rose.klemperer@anthonycollins.com

Latest news, webinars and podcasts

Charities fortnightly round-up 17
Charities fortnightly round-up 17

Six months after the first recorded case of COVID-19 in the UK, it is clear that charities, community organisations and volunteers have played a huge role in the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Reactivation Notices for Possession Claims that have been stayed
Reactivation Notices for Possession Claims that have been stayed

This article is further to our previous e-briefing (published on 22 July 2020) where we informed you that there are new temporary measures (a new Practice Direction PD55c) that have been brought into deal with possession claims, following the stay being lifted on possession claims on 22 August 2020.

PODCAST: Injunction applications
PODCAST: Injunction applications

A podcast from Alex Loxton and Sumi Begum from our housing litigation team, discussing injunction applications and the courts approach in light of COVID-19 and the ban on possession proceedings.

Common redundancy questions
Common redundancy questions

We have asked colleagues in the Employment Law team to highlight what they think is key to managing a redundancy programme well.

Cancer care during COVID-19
Cancer care during COVID-19

There’s no doubt about it, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed incredible pressure on the NHS.

SDLT 'Holiday' announcement
SDLT 'Holiday' announcement

Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s £3.8 billion SDLT giveaway may bring benefits for registered providers of social housing, according to ACS experts in the sector.