The Academies Financial Handbook is updated annually by the Department for Education and the Education and Skills Funding Agency; it contains a number of governance requirements for academy trusts.
The statutory ground for divorce under the 1973 Matrimonial Causes Act, amended by the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, is the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage of at least one year’s duration. This ground for divorce is evidence by one of five facts:
- your spouse has committed adultery;
- your spouse has behaved unreasonably;
- your spouse has deserted you for two years;
- you have lived apart for two years and your spouse consents to the divorce; or
- you have lived apart for five years.
Financial claims following divorce are settled by either an agreement or a court order. How this is settled depends on the statutory framework and years of case law that guide the solicitors involved. The length of the marriage relationship is a key factor in determining how assets are apportioned. Principles of fairness, need sharing, compensation and sharing must be taken into account.
Despite the best efforts of family solicitors to disabuse the public of its existence, many people still espouse the concept of the ‘common law’ husband or wife. However, there is no statutory process to regulate the breakup of an unmarried couple and, instead, the unmarried party must rely on strict and, often complicated, property rights.
In the absence of an express written intention (in the best case a Deed of Trust, and the worst case a letter of intention), the court looks to the legal title; whose name(s) is on the deeds or, these days, registered at the Land Registry as the legal owner(s)? Unless you are married to the owner you have no statutory family-related right to make a claim. Contribution might be ignored completely. In exceptional circumstances, the court will try to infer an intention from people’s behaviour – even if it was never discussed. Not an easy task.
The situation can be even worse when the house is in the sole legal ownership of just one party. Did the other party pay for the central heating or build an extension? Did he tell her she couldn’t be a co-owner because she wasn’t working? Did she give up her own tenancy to move in and help pay the mortgage? The first is deception, the second is detrimental reliance.
For further information
Supreme Court publishes key decision for those working in the UK’s gig economy.
The 'Chocolate Snowman Appeal' is an amazing initiative that Anthony Collins Solicitors' (ACS) employees take part in every year.
The Building Safety Bill (the Bill) is said to be the most significant and wide-ranging change to the regulatory environment for higher risk building (HRBs) for over 45 years.
On 4 November 2020, the Restriction of Public Exit Payments Regulations 2020 (the Regulations) came into force; exit payments for the public sector were capped at £95,000.
The case was brought by the Official Receiver who sought disqualification orders under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA 1986) against the seven trustees of Kids Company and its CEO. It illustrates well the tension between the role of a fulltime paid CEO of a large charity and the role of its board as voluntary trustees/directors.
At the end of 2020, The Charity Governance Code was updated or 'refreshed' as it is termed on its website.
Anthony Collins Solicitors is today (Thursday 11 February) revealing the scale of its social impact during 2020.
In their first podcast of this series, current and future trainees will discuss their journey and route to securing a training contract at Anthony Collins Solicitors.
A recent prosecution by the Health and Safety Executive ("HSE") demonstrates the importance of organisations regularly inspecting, maintaining, and if necessary, repairing or replacing street furnitur
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.