Residents are now unable to make applications to prohibit landlords from seeking to recover the cost of legal proceedings through the service charge on behalf of other residents, without consent.
The specific requirement in the Standard is: -
“To maintain a thorough, accurate and up to date record of their assets and liabilities and particularly those liabilities that may have recourse to social housing assets” (Paragraph 1.5.1(a))
The accompanying Code will require liabilities to be “in the widest context” and that is hardly surprising given the tale of woe apparent from the Cosmopolitan saga. There is no prescribed format, nor a list of what is to go in – it is all up to each provider, or to be specific, each board, since the Code states that the Regulator expects the Board to oversee the Asset Register.
In our view clients should be considering the following areas: -
|Property (understand property as an asset)||Finance (cashflow etc)|
|Planning (making sure conditions are complied with and you have evidence to that effect)||Title (the need to link with development)|
|Regulatory (known and anticipated potential impacts)||Loans (treasury management etc)|
There is a clear risk of a compliance industry being created here but we are not talking about a requirement for some all-encompassing database/spreadsheet; what we are talking about is for providers to have this information up to date, accurate, and at hand – and crucially to see it not just in the light of a compliance requirement but as an essential business tool fundamentally informing the VfM agenda. And to underline the point the Code provides that assets which have a negative impact should be easily identifiable.
Another way of looking at things is to consider if you were working for another provider and rescuing your organisation what would you need? What would the Regulator want to see if they ever had to intervene? What do you want to see when you are purchasing properties from another provider?
Finally the asset register needs to scope up all that company information that the board needs to be able to make decisions; what are the cross group guarantees; what off balance sheet funding is there; what dependencies are there.
Don’t forget that boards will need regularly (at least annually) updating.
For more information
Natalie Barbosa summarises some of the legal challenges facing fundraisers in the charity sector.
We hosted a breakfast roundtable with Insider Midlands magazine that had attendees from a range of organisations addressing housing needs in the Midlands. The discussion explored JVs in more detail.
The decision of the Court of Appeal in The Harpur Trust v Brazel & Unison has made clear that employers can no longer legally calculate part-time holiday based on 12.07% of hours worked over a year.
Social landlords are seeing a rising number of Equality Act defences to possession proceedings. A recent Court of Appeal decision helps shift the likelihood of such defences succeeding.
On 31 July, the consultation period ended on MHCLG’s proposals for reforming the building safety regulatory system set out in the 'Building a Safer Future' document. We have submitted our response.
For decades now, fewer and fewer services provided by local authorities have been delivered directly by them. However, over the last couple of years, there are signs that this tide is changing.
The Government commissioned an independent review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 in July 2018. The outcome was published in May 2019 which highlighted areas for improvement.
In 2017, the NCVO commissioned a review of the tax reliefs available to charities. The brainchild of this review was published on 17 July 2019 in the form of the Charity Tax Commission report.
In 2014, the Charity Commission released its first guidance for charities on reporting serious incidents. The Commission has recently updated this guidance.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.