The recent decision of Senior Judge Lush in the case of Re GM provides a window into the workings of a dysfunctional lay deputyship, whilst helpfully clarifying the threshold of “acceptable” giving from P’s assets. The continual reference throughout the court proceedings to what some may consider a minor or peripheral matter also reminds us that the aspects of decision-making which make the greatest difference to the day to day quality of life for P may rarely be the substantive issue of any proceedings.
To see the article in full, click on the link: [media type=”link” id=21].
Contact Sheree Green on sheree.green@anthonycollins.com or 0121 212 7495.
Latest news
Social purpose law firm strengthens cyber risk and privacy expertise
Joining as a legal director, Ben brings over a decade of experience advising on all aspects of data privacy and cyber risk. His expertise spans both the public and private […]
Thursday 5 June 2025
Read moreAnthony Collins statement following Legal Aid Agency data breach
This data breach solely affects the Legal Aid Agency and is not connected to Anthony Collins. Further details and official updates can be found on the Government’s website. According to […]
Monday 19 May 2025
Read moreLatest webinars and podcasts
Podcast: Service charge and estate charge for registered providers
In this episode, Penny Bournes and Emma Lloyd examine how the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 will impact private registered providers, particularly in terms of service charge administration, cost […]
Wednesday 19 March 2025
Read morePodcast: Service charge and estate charge for local authorities
In this episode, Penny Bournes and Emma Lloyd examine how the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 will impact local authority landlords, specifically regarding service charges and estate management charges. […]
Monday 3 March 2025
Read more