Much of the discourse around charity independence comprises guidance for charities on ensuring political neutrality when campaigning, separation of charities from the state/non-charitable organisations and arms-length relationships with trading subsidiaries.
What is not often considered is a charity’s independence from charitable partners that it considers beneficial, or even essential, to its success.
Do charity trustees have a duty of independence?
According to Charity Commission guidance, independence means that your charity must:
- exist only to further its charitable purposes for the public benefit;
- not exist for the purposes of another organisation; and
- be governed by its trustees acting only in the interests of the charity.
The Charities Act 2011 set out the only explicit duty regarding independence; that a director of a charitable company must exercise their powers independently, without subordinating themselves to the will of others.
However, some duties apply to all charities, no matter what their legal structure, seeking to ensure that trustees are independent of external influences. For example, trustees must avoid putting themselves in a position where their duty to their charity conflicts with a personal interest or loyalty to another entity (including another charity). The Charity Governance Code also advises that trustees must be independent in their decision making, must not be unduly influenced by others and must act in the best interests of the charity.
What does a lack of independence look like?
The lack of independence in a charity is often the sum of small parts.
For example, if your charity has an umbrella body as its sole member, there is nothing wrong with this on its own. However, if that umbrella body also appoints the trustees (and the trustees have no ability to co-opt) or requires its own representatives to be trustees then arguably the charity is controlled by a third party at both membership and trustee level. The trustees may also have consistent conflicts of interest or conflicts of loyalty because of their relationship with the umbrella body and be unable to manage those conflicts.
Independence may also be lost by degrees in cases where:
- there is an over-emphasis on the engagement with members of a charity;
- there is an over-reliance on services provided by a third party; or
- there are obligations placed on trustees to provide charitable funds to other organisations without the ability for them to agree that this is the best way for the objects of the charity to be advanced.
What are the consequences of a lack of independence?
The consequences of a charity’s lack of independence and a failure to manage conflicts of interest with its partners are that:
- the trustees are likely to be failing to fulfil their duties as charity trustees to act in the best interests of the charity;
- there could be tax and other financial consequences for the charity (for example, an inability to claim Gift Aid); and
- in cases where the trustees are unable to make independent decisions, there is a risk that the charity may not be a charity within the definition of the law of England and Wales.
Is my charity independent enough?
If you think your charity would benefit from advice on its independence, our Charity Governance Team will be happy to help you review your charity’s structure, its group structure or draft a comprehensive conflict of interest policy.
For more information
Please contact Catherine Gibbons.
Latest news
Anthony Collins advised B3Living on strategic acquisition of 250 social homes
The social housing team at Anthony Collins advised Hertfordshire-based B3Living on the successful acquisition of 250 social homes from Orbit Group.
Tuesday 19 November 2024
Read moreAnthony Collins promotes and appoints 19
19 promotions and appointments have been announced including two partners, two legal directors, two senior associates and four associates, as well as a number of appointments within the central management […]
Monday 4 November 2024
Read moreLatest webinars and podcasts
Podcast: Who gets the microwave? Episode 2 – Non-court dispute resolution
Listen to the second in a series of podcasts from our matrimonial team where Tom Gregory, Chris Lloyd-Smith and Maria Ramon put down their litigation weapons and discuss the importance of […]
Friday 22 November 2024
Read morePODCAST: Who gets the microwave?
The first in a series of podcasts from our matrimonial team begins with the team discussing what happens to pets during divorce and separation.
Friday 16 August 2024
Read more