Our Housing team are delighted following a formal tender procurement process to have been appointed to three lots under the new multi-million-pound legal services framework for The Riverside Group.
But now the market is changing. It is no longer attractive to a client to pay for lawyer's time without some reliable information about just how long it's all going to take. Lawyers have complained that fixed fees are unworkable and unfair – we don't know how 'the other side' will behave, will it be a big argument or will they see sense and agree quickly? We don't know if the court will co-operate with us – will the judge insist on extra hearings or additional evidence? The client isn't really keen on a fixed fee either – what happens when we reach the limit – will the lawyer lose interest? Will I get the office junior when I want an experienced adviser?
The solution: 'unbundling' or more plainly, paying for what you want, when you want it - not what the lawyer wants to give you. People's circumstances are different. It sounds obvious but plainly, some are cash rich and time poor and some the other way around. One size doesn't fit all. Working together with your lawyer to achieve your goals means choosing what you can do yourself and what you can't. Much of the costs of divorce are reflected in the regular correspondence by letter or telephone between legal representatives and the third parties or waiting at court in now often crowded lists. Paying an expert for a straightforward transactional part of the process doesn't make financial sense when you could do it yourself. Far better to take an hours' advice at the outset and come back for more when the issues are refined; this means you can get the added value from a trusted adviser who's seen it all before. You can come back whenever you need to and however many times is necessary.
From a financial point of view, 'unbundling' is good for cash flow and controlling your costs. Effectively it's a pay-as-you-go arrangement with less risk of runaway costs and an unhappy professional arrangement with the lawyer you want on your side.
Alternative solutions to going to court are becoming more popular: mediation, collaborative working, round table meetings, and arbitration. In these contexts you might chose to take advice before and after or even to have your lawyer with you on the day. You might want your lawyer to draft the agreement when you reach it.
There will always be some who chose to keep their lawyer close, to shadow all situations and to consult on every step. That brings peace of mind and constant reassurance, but it comes at a price. Choosing to operate this way should be a conscious decision not an expectation at the outset in every case or something we drift into and end up with a bill we didn't expect. Take charge of your charges!
Elizabeth Wyatt is a partner and divorce, family and matrimonial law specialist at Anthony Collins Solicitors.
For more information
For further information, please call Liz on 0121 212 7417 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Necrotising Fasciitis, more commonly known as the ‘flesh-eating disease’, is a significant medical condition that requires urgent treatment.
Many of us who have been following the unfolding Inquest, are not surprised that the Coroner found gross and significant failures on the part of those caring for him.
Transferring out of SHPS will not be suitable for every housing association. So what should housing associations do?
In all the action to remove defective cladding, leaseholders have been the elephant in the room. Whilst social landlords might have adopted a wait and see approach private landlords do not have that luxury.
We welcome the Labour Party’s commitment to doubling the size of the co-operative economy. We wholeheartedly support the ambition to grow this vitally important part of the economy.
It was first referred to in the Charities Act 2006 (which was subsequently replaced by the Charities Act 2011) but it has finally been announced that charitable companies are able to convert to a charitable incorporated organisation (“CIO”).
The Private Members Bill Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation and Liability for Housing Standards) Bill 2017-19 now has Government support and was debated at second reading on Friday 19 January 2018.
In short - yes. This is a common question in personal injury or clinical negligence claims and has recently come before the High Court in judicial review proceedings.
GDPR The General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) will come into force on 25 May 2018 and bring changes to the rules governing data protection and the requirements placed on organisations which control or process personal data.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.