Providers need to be alive to the risk of contractors becoming insolvent and how to limit the resulting inevitable disruption.
The standards of care that patients and their families can expect from public and private health services in England and Wales are at the centre of an intense public debate.
On 5 February 2013 Robert Francis QC sent his report on the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry to Jeremy Hunt, the Secretary of State for Health. In his covering letter Robert Francis emphasised that the recent Stafford Hospital saga told a story “first and foremost of appalling suffering to patients” caused by a failure to “tackle an insidious negative culture”.
The Inquiry found that the whole NHS system, formed by “a plethora of agencies, scrutiny groups, commissioners, regulators and professional bodies” failed to detect and do anything to remedy a huge “non-compliance with acceptable standards of care”.
On 26 March the Government published its initial response, “Patients First and Foremost”. Like the report, the response has led to the voicing of strenuous and often conflicting opinions from professional bodies, patient groups and the general public.
The Government’s Response
The Government understandably wants the quality of patient care to be at the heart of future health and care services. The Health Secretary has announced in Parliament that a culture of compassion will be a key marker of success, supposedly spelling an end to the distorting impact of targets and box ticking, which led to the failings at Stafford Hospital.
In particular the Department of Health has decided that “hospitals and care homes will be encouraged to strive to be the best, while the basic values of dignity and respect will be central to care training and, if things go wrong, patients and their families will be told about it.”
Radical new measures are to be introduced to achieve this, including Ofsted-style ratings for hospitals and care homes. A pilot programme will also see nurses working for up to a year as a healthcare assistant as a prerequisite for receiving funding for their degrees, although nurse groups have questioned how workable this proposal is.
A Culture of Zero-Harm
At the centre of the Government’s response to the Francis Report is its intention to introduce a new regulatory system, with a culture of zero-harm at the core, under a strong and independent Chief Inspector of Hospitals. The Chief Inspector is expected to introduce single aggregated ratings for hospitals and will assess all hospital complaints procedures.
There will also be changes at the Care Quality Commission. In the future, hospital inspections will include judgements about a hospital’s overall performance, including whether patients are listened to and treated with dignity and respect. The safety of services, general responsiveness, proper clinical standards and sound governance will all be under review.
The Government has further announced that it intends to appoint a new Chief Inspector of Social Care to ensure the same rigour is applied across the health and care system. However, at the moment no specific details about the powers or terms of appointment for the Chief Inspector of Social Care have been announced.
Dealing with Wrongdoers
Finally, the Francis’ Report was concerned about the general lack of accountability of wrongdoers. In response to this the Government is considering introducing legal sanctions at a corporate level for providers of health services who knowingly generate misleading information or withhold information from patients or relatives.
As far as individual wrongdoers are concerned, the General Medical Council, the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the other professional regulators are being asked to tighten the procedures for dealing with individual health and social care professionals who have breached professional standards. Unsuitable healthcare assistants are to be barred from practice.
Whilst all of these proposals have raised some questions from within the medical sector, the most essential aspect of the Government’s response to the Francis Report is its desire to act, and to reduce the possibility of a scandal such as Stafford Hospital from ever happening again. There is no doubt that the workability of some of the suggestions needs to be explored, however as long as patient care is kept at the centre of the Government’s actions, the end result will certainly be positive.
Housing associations must continue to deliver core functions effectively and compliantly notwithstanding the uncertainty over the standards to which you will be held in the future.
Over the last few years the meaning of “asset management” has changed from being all about repairs to understanding that assets might not stay in an organisation forever.
The Grenfell Tower tragedy has understandably prompted a fundamental reconsideration of how building safety is approached for High-Rise Residential Buildings.
Results from the latest three-yearly valuation of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) are starting to trickle through.
The potential for Brexit with or without a deal causes uncertainty, and credit rating agencies do not like uncertainty.
Let’s face it, Wills are underappreciated and often overlooked. In fact, around 54% of the British public do not have one!
A recent case throws light on the scope of the exemption for “land transactions” from the need for an OJEU tender process.
A leaked report into maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust revealed by The Independent has been described as the “largest maternity scandal in NHS history”.
The Pensions Regulator is showing its determination to improve the prudent management of Local Government Pension funds by digging deep into the internal workings of these funds.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.