NAFP, a not-for-profit organisation which represents independent and voluntary sector fostering providers, is seeking to challenge the Councils’ compliance with their duties under the Children Act 1989 (the “Act”). Section 22C(5) of the Act imposes a duty on the Councils, as local authorities, to place looked after children in the “placement which is, in their opinion, the most appropriate placement available”.
NAFP are seeking to challenge the Councils’ compliance with this duty on the basis of the Councils’ alleged failure to adopt a ‘level playing field’ approach where placements are considered with both in-house and independent and voluntary sector providers. NAFP are of the view that unless the Councils consider both in-house and independent and voluntary sector providers at the same time when determining the placements of looked after children that they are failing in their duty to find “the most appropriate placement available”.
In granting permission the Court observed that:
“Section 22C(5) of the Children Act 1989 imposes an important duty on authorities in the position of the Defendant and the Claimant has…shown sufficient grounds to permit the claim to proceed to a substantive hearing.”
Emma Young and Cynyr Rhys of Anthony Collins Solicitors and Counsel Ian Wise QC and Stephen Broach of Monkton Chambers represent NAFP.
Harvey Gallagher, Chief Executive of NAFP, said:
“We want to ensure that every child in care gets not just a good placement, but the placement that is right for them, the placement that can best meet their needs more than any other. Our concern is that the current placement finding processes used by many local authorities, including the Defendants, is unlawful and means that children will be missing out and may not get the very best home we can offer them. This has to change so that we are able to do better for children in care and give them the best possible opportunity to thrive in a loving home.”
Cynyr Rhys, of Anthony Collins Solicitors, said:
“Despite the Defendants robustly defending our client’s application, we are pleased that the Court has granted permission thereby recognising that this is an issue that merits further judicial consideration. The Defendants, together with other local authorities, exercise a fundamentally important duty under the Children Act 1989 which affects some of the most vulnerable children in society. Therefore it is crucial to ensure that the Defendants are exercising their duty correctly”.
Contact Cynyr Rhys.
Aside from the COVID-19 pandemic, a key theme of 2020 has been diversity and inclusivity. This two-part update addresses this theme in detail
Covid-19 has resulted, on the whole, in a marked co-operation between contracting authorities and their suppliers as everybody focuses on maintaining delivery as far as possible.
Employment Tribunal rules in favour of claimants in minimum wage case – has the interpretation of “working time” changed?
As we enter a recession, we have been here before, and a key question is what did we learn and how can we benefit from that learning?
It is anticipated that as lockdown restrictions ease, and particularly with children and young adults returning to education, cases of meningitis will start to rise.
As we continue to emerge from lockdown measures and deal with local measures and the short and long term economic impact of Covid-19, local authorities will need to re-assess how services will be delivered for years to come.
The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
One change proposed by the Building Safety Bill is the introduction of a duty holder regime, which will see statutory responsibility for the safety of higher risk buildings placed on key individuals
Throughout this pandemic, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been publishing various “Statements on Coronavirus” (Statements) which provide guidance on consumer rights during this time.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.