The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
Under the Working Time Regulations (WTR) a worker is entitled to a 20-minute rest break away from their workstation if their daily working time exceeds six hours. However, there are limited circumstances where employers are exempt from providing this rest break so long as they ensure that “compensatory rest” is given.
A recent case of Crawford v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd considered whether compensatory rest has to be taken in one uninterrupted period or whether a series of short breaks can be aggregated to amount to the requisite time.
Mr Crawford worked for Network Rail as a railway signalman. He worked on single-manned boxes on 8-hour shifts. Network Rail had a document that set out the provision of rest breaks for signallers that provided that:
“At such (single-manned) locations breaks must be taken between periods of operational demand when there are opportunities for “naturally occurring breaks”...at such locations the 20-minute break may be an aggregate of shorter breaks.”
As Mr Crawford worked in railway transport and his activities were linked to transport timetables, and to ensuring the continuity and regularity of traffic, the right to a 20-minute rest break did not apply, but compensatory rest had to be provided.
Network Rail felt that aggregated breaks were sufficient to meet the compensatory rest requirement for the 20-minute break. Mr Crawford argued that the requirement for compensatory rest was not being met and, therefore, he made a complaint to the Employment Tribunal for breach of the WTR.
The Tribunal agreed with Network Rail. Mr Crawford appealed this decision to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), who upheld Mr Crawford’s appeal.
The EAT found that whilst Mr Crawford could still be on call during compensatory rest, the compensatory rest must amount to a break that lasted at least 20 minutes. The EAT referenced and followed the approach in the case of Hughes v The Corps of Commissionaires Management Ltd in which a security guard who worked alone on site was permitted to take breaks from his desk in the kitchen whenever he liked but was always on call. If he was disturbed whilst taking a break, he would be able to return to the kitchen and start his break again following dealing with the incident.
This case highlights that rest given by employers to compensate for any missed or disturbed 20-minute break entitlement must be a single uninterrupted period of at least 20 minutes. Employers should have this in mind when planning compensatory rest breaks and cover for these.
It is interesting to note that the position is less clear when it comes to daily or weekly rest entitlements. The prevailing view is that compensatory rest should equal the length of the interruptions to the period of rest and not the entirety of that period. However, this is an area where complete clarity is not attainable as the entitlement to rest under the WTR is to uninterrupted rest.
For more information
We have advised a significant number of clients, including in the social care sector and the housing sector, on structuring their services and rotas in a way that ensures compliance. If you require assistance with your working arrangements, please get in touch with your usual contact in our Employment Team or speak to Faye Rush. You can find out more about our employment work on our website.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.