In the absence of adultery or long periods of separation, those who want to end their marriage need to detail allegations of unreasonable behaviour on the part of their spouse. This puts an intention to divorce amicably under considerable strain.

My clients often ask me, "Why can't we divorce by mutual agreement? Our American cousins are able to, just by citing irreconcilable differences." The answer is that the current state of our law, unchanged since the 1970s, simply doesn't allow it; even though marriages rarely end due to the fault of just one party. Because of this, both parties and the solicitors assisting with the divorce proceedings need to handle the divorce carefully.

The 'pre-action protocol' (which outlines the expected conduct and steps a court expects couples to take) requires a draft of the reasons for divorce to be shared amongst all parties, before it is issued to the court. This is done in an attempt to gain mutual agreement of the allegations, and is very difficult. I have found that some of my clients want to avoid going down this route. It (potentially) increases costs and, unfortunately, some clients have the perception that not all solicitors will encourage peaceful engagement. However, peaceful engagement is always preferred, where possible, by Anthony Collins Solicitors.

In a recent survey of family lawyers, carried out by Resolution, over 90% agreed that divorce law needs to be modernised to allow for no-fault divorce. As well as no-fault divorce being a better option for separating couples, family solicitors have also predicted that the change in legislation would see a rise in the:

 

 

Another challenge is the discretionary nature of the judge's jurisdiction in financial proceedings. Despite legislation and case law for guidance, throwing yourself on the mercy of a third party to decide your financial future brings inherent uncertainty. You can never know exactly what the judge will do; good lawyers can only advise so far. It is better to reach an agreement with your spouse or partner over the kitchen table or, if that proves impossible, use other forms of dispute resolution, such as family mediation. It's cheaper, quicker and more certain than fighting it out in court.

Cost can be a big challenge for all but the super rich - what you pay to solicitors can deplete the family 'pot'. In the absence of meaningful cost penalties, the client never recovers these costs. There's no doubt that the ability to pay does affect the calibre of solicitors available to you, but there are alternatives in the form of litigation funding or ad-hoc usage of legal advice, known as 'unbundling'. It is worth enquiring if these services are available before selecting a solicitor.

For further information

To find out more about how Anthony Collins Solicitors can support you through a divorce or marriage and relationship challenges, please contact Elizabeth Wyatt.

Is £400m enough?
Is £400m enough?

The government announced on 16 May that it will provide a fund of £400m to cover the costs of removal and replacement of cladding to high rise residential blocks which have failed tests.

The problems with co-owned properties and attorneys
The problems with co-owned properties and attorneys

Whilst some people are under the impression that preparing a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is simply a case of completing a form and ticking a few boxes, it is about far more than this.

What's mine is (not) yours!
What's mine is (not) yours!

A big fear for some people facing divorce and the inevitable carving up of the matrimonial assets. They seek assurances that such assets will be “ring-fenced” and retained for them.

How to avoid the PET trap
How to avoid the PET trap

When an individual is thinking about making a gift to another individual, consideration needs to be given to the Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) trap.

Fictitious divorces
Fictitious divorces

Arising from the recent Family Division announcement, people who think they are legally divorced may in fact still be married.