On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
Until the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunals Fees Order 2013 came into force in 2013, a claimant could bring proceedings without paying any fees. The Fees Order came into force in an effort to deter unmeritorious claims and allay the burden on taxpayers.
The appeal in the above case arose out of proceedings for judicial review, in which the appellant, Unison, argued that the Fees Order was unlawful because the prescribed fees restrict access to justice, frustrate the operation of Parliamentary legislation granting employment rights, and discriminate unlawfully against women and other protected groups.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court has allowed the appeal. The Supreme Court held that the Fees Order is unlawful under both domestic and EU law because the fees prevent access to justice. The Supreme Court found that fees were most frequently cited as the reason for not submitting a claim and that where households on low-to-middle incomes can only afford fees by forgoing an acceptable standard of living, the fees cannot be regarded as affordable.
The Court further found that the Fees Order is unlawful because it contravenes the guarantee of an effective remedy before a tribunal under EU law, as it imposes disproportionate limitations on the enforcement of EU employment rights.
Finally, the Court held that the Fees Order is indirectly discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010 because a higher proportion of women bring type B rather than type A claims, and the higher fees under type B claims, therefore, put women at a particular disadvantage.
The Court could not find a correlation between the higher fees and the merits of a case and that meritorious and unmeritorious claims could be deterred by the higher fees.
The ruling means that the Fees Order has been quashed. The Government will be forced to repay approximately £27million to individuals who have paid tribunal fees since 2013. There won’t be recourse for employers who have paid employees fees as part of the settlement of claims, but, where unsuccessful Employers have been ordered to pay fees, they can expect to recover them. This will be a challenging job to administer.
Given that the Labour party manifesto proposed to abolish fees, politically, it may prove challenging for the Government to get any revised approach to Tribunal fees through Parliament and therefore this may be the last we see of Tribunal fees for at least this Parliament. Employers can expect to see an increase in Tribunal claims on the back of this decision. We consider the reduction in claims since 2013 was also influenced by the move to needing two years’ service to bring an unfair dismissal claim and, as a result, we don’t expect claims to return to 2013 levels.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
A long-awaited decision of the Court of Appeal has clarified that a lower standard of proof should apply than previously thought before an Inquest can return a conclusion of suicide.
New regulations come into force on 1 June 2019, amending the Section 21 (s21) prescribed form template for use with assured shorthold tenancies.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.