This clarification overrides the discrepancy in the Recovery of Capital Grants and Recycled Capital Grant Fund General Determination 2017 (the “Determination”) that indicates otherwise.

 The background

It is a long accepted practice that on the transfer of properties from one RP to another, any grant would automatically transfer.  The HCA would usually approve this as part of an application for disposal under Sections 172 or 133 for consent to disposal: those sections have now been repealed and replaced by the new notification regime.

The Determination sets out a number of “Relevant Events”.  Those Relevant Events trigger an obligation to repay or recycle the grant in accordance with Determination and Capital Funding Guide (“CFG”).  Disposals of land would usually trigger liability, but there is an exception (under category (o)(i)), which states:

“to a Registered Provider (taking the  property or land subject to liability for the Capital Grant within it pursuant to section 33 of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, Section 27(6) of the Housing Act 1996 or any other predecessor legislation with equivalent effect) with prior approval of the Agency;” (our emphasis).

A strict interpretation of this wording implies the HCA will have to give prior consent to the transfer of grant on disposals between RPs to ensure the grant transfers automatically.  We questioned whether this was really the interpretation of this wording?

The clarification

The HCA has confirmed that this is not the intention. Whilst the wording of the Determination implies that consent is required, the HCA will not require that RPs seek its approval where they are transferring grant-funded property or land to another RP. The HCA is not proposing to alter the wording of the Determination in the meantime.

So what does this mean?

When property is transferring between RPs, any grant will automatically transfer. There is no need to obtain the consent of the HCA to this. The parties simply have to notify the HCA of the transfer in accordance with the procedures and processes set down in the CFG.

For more information

For more information, please contact Jonathan Cox.

Is £400m enough?
Is £400m enough?

The government announced on 16 May that it will provide a fund of £400m to cover the costs of removal and replacement of cladding to high rise residential blocks which have failed tests.

The problems with co-owned properties and attorneys
The problems with co-owned properties and attorneys

Whilst some people are under the impression that preparing a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is simply a case of completing a form and ticking a few boxes, it is about far more than this.

What's mine is (not) yours!
What's mine is (not) yours!

A big fear for some people facing divorce and the inevitable carving up of the matrimonial assets. They seek assurances that such assets will be “ring-fenced” and retained for them.

How to avoid the PET trap
How to avoid the PET trap

When an individual is thinking about making a gift to another individual, consideration needs to be given to the Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) trap.

Fictitious divorces
Fictitious divorces

Arising from the recent Family Division announcement, people who think they are legally divorced may in fact still be married.