The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
The individual (Ms C) was placed in residential care before the Care Act 2014 came into force, and her relatives agreed to pay a £50 weekly top-up fee towards her care costs. The relatives agreed to this on the understanding that it could be paid out of Ms C’s own savings. When they were later advised that the top-up could not be paid out of Ms C’s savings, they raised their concerns with the local authority that they would not be able to afford to pay the top-up, which was also due to increase to £61 per week.
In this case, the LGO found there was no evidence that the local authority had identified an alternative placement for Ms C, discussed the affordability of the top-up with Ms C’s relatives or searched for vacancies at any other care homes. The LGO determined that the local authority was at fault and was required to refund £4,628 in top-up payments to Ms C’s relatives, issue an apology, and reassess Ms C’s needs before making any changes to her care plan – including any change of placement.
When are top-ups appropriate?
The LGO has previously identified  that local authorities often fail to provide sufficient information about social care funding, do not present a genuine choice of placements and frequently avoid their responsibility for paying top-ups. The default position is that where an individual has been assessed as needing care, the local authority remains responsible for funding the appropriate care.
Top-ups should only be charged if the individual explicitly chooses a care provider that is more expensive than the local authority would usually expect to pay: this cannot be the case where no alternative care provision is offered.
When considering whether a top-up is appropriate or entering into negotiations for an increased top-up contribution, local authorities must:
- identify whether there is a suitable, alternative placement available that does not require a top-up;
- provide individuals with sufficient information to understand when top-ups can be made, either by a third-party or by the individual receiving care;
- enter into a written top-up agreement with payers; and
- continue to review the affordability of the top-up, especially where individuals raise concerns.
It is not for the care homes or other care providers to enter into a top-up agreement or arrange the payments. Even where the individual fails to pay the top-up, the local authority remains responsible for the total cost of care. The decision shows that the LGO is still a useful tool for individuals who have exhausted the complaints process or are unable to pursue remedy through the courts. You can read the full decision here.
For further information
If you are a care provider having difficulty recovering top-up payments from the local authority, please contact Emma Watt . If you would like to discuss how to plan for your future care costs or to discuss a community care claim, our private client team may be able to assist.
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
One change proposed by the Building Safety Bill is the introduction of a duty holder regime, which will see statutory responsibility for the safety of higher risk buildings placed on key individuals
Throughout this pandemic, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been publishing various “Statements on Coronavirus” (Statements) which provide guidance on consumer rights during this time.
A recent increase in COVID-19 cases in the UK means new measures are being put in place in an effort to reduce the risk of a second wave. Whilst the impact of COVID-19 continues to be felt, it is important to remain focused on the sector’s road to recovery.
Sometimes half an hour at a conference gives you the reality that has been staring you in the face all along. That was my experience watching “Change is on the Horizon”
Following our recent e-briefing on Possession Notices, Helen Tucker and Emilie Pownall from our housing litigation team discuss the impact of the changes on social landlords.
Not only has the possession stay been extended until 20 September, the notice periods to be given to tenants has been extended in certain circumstances with some important exceptions.
The Court has confirmed that a party cannot withhold its consent in order to re-write the original bargain.
Following the Grenfell Tower tragedy, building safety continues to be a key concern for social housing providers and their residents.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.