The recent decision of Senior Judge Lush in the case of Re GM provides a window into the workings of a dysfunctional lay deputyship, whilst helpfully clarifying the threshold of “acceptable” giving from P’s assets. The continual reference throughout the court proceedings to what some may consider a minor or peripheral matter also reminds us that the aspects of decision-making which make the greatest difference to the day to day quality of life for P may rarely be the substantive issue of any proceedings.

To see the article in full, click on the link: [media type="link" id=21].

This article first featured in appeared in The Law Society's PS Magazine (November 2013 edition) - for more information about the magazine, click here

For more information

Contact Sheree Green on or 0121 212 7495.