The Government has announced its intention to lift the shielding requirement for extremely vulnerable people. Katherine Sinclair and Libby Hubbard discuss...
Statutory regulation of tenancy deposits was introduced in April 2007 under the Housing Act 2004 (“the Act”). s.213 of the Act placed an obligation on landlords to pay their tenant’s deposits into an authorised scheme.
But what about those deposits which were paid by tenants before April 2007?
In this recent case [Michalis Charalambous (1) & Katerina Karali (2) V (1) Maureen Rosairie Ng (1) Kok Ho Ng (2) (2014)], the tenant paid a deposit in 2002 after taking a one year tenancy. The tenancy was renewed twice and when the last tenancy ended in 2005, a periodic tenancy arose under the 1988 Act. The landlord did not pay the tenant’s deposit into an authorised scheme at any stage. In 2012, the landlord served a Section 21 Notice on the tenant.
The Court of Appeal held that the landlord’s Section 21 Notice was invalid because the tenant's deposit had not been paid into an authorised scheme as required by the Act, regardless of the fact that when the deposit was paid in 2002, there was then no requirement to pay it into a scheme.
It was held that s.215(1)(a) of the Act, which prevents a landlord from serving a notice under s.21 of the 1988 Act whilst a deposit is unprotected, applied.
The lesson to learn is that the landlord could have served a valid Section 21 Notice by either paying the deposit into an authorised scheme, or by repaying the deposit to the tenant.
In view of this recent decision, landlords must audit older tenancies to carefully consider how they are managing their tenant’s deposits. If not paid into an authorised scheme, do so now. Otherwise your hands will be tied if you need to seek possession.
For more information
For more information on deposits and authorised schemes generally, please contact any member of our housing litigation team via 0121 212 7400.
The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 has now received Royal Assent. It applies to most companies as well as Limited Liability Partnerships.
The latest development in the long history of sodium valproate was the publication of The Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review today
Failure to provide minimum pension contribution protection following a TUPE transfer can end up costing a lot more than if provision had been made.
More than 700 people were consulted about their experiences of pelvic mesh, Primodos and an epilepsy drug called Sodium Valproate.
Making an application to the Court of Protection to make or change a Will for someone who is not able to do this themselves due to lacking mental capacity.
The online divorce system is a fantastic facility available to both legal professionals and litigants in person.
In a comprehensive judgement, the High Court rejected a challenge by Stagecoach to the procurement of new franchises for the South Eastern, East Midlands and West Coast rail lines.
With lockdown restrictions further lifting on 4 July, charities have a lot to think about.
We have advised a number of families, alongside Ms Ockenden’s review, in relation to concerns as to the care and treatment provided by maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals Trust.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.