Many LSVT Registered Providers (“RPs”) have come of age – or will soon be coming of age -after delivering their offer document promises. This provides RPs with the perfect platform to start to work towards a more mature, business like, relationship with their transferring council.

A potential hurdle to this fundamental development step is any outstanding financial liability owed to the RP by the councils under the stock transfer agreement. As part of the stock transfer process, councils provide various warranties and/or indemnities in favour of the RP; most notably dangerous substances, including asbestos. What steps can, and should, an RP take when a warranty is found to be inaccurate, or breached, or an indemnity limit reached?

Understandably, many RPs are reluctant to ‘rock the boat’ due to the need for a continued working relationship with their council on issues such as planning consent for planned development. However, can RPs realistically ‘look the other way’ when a potential claim exists with the consequential financial implications for the organisation?

Stepping out of a council’s shadow by bringing such a claim will inevitably cause some friction; however, the appropriate management of claims can ensure that a working relationship with the council is maintained.

With our substantial stock transfer and RPs governance experience we often advise upon, and manage, claims arising out of stock transfer warranties and indemnities. We work with clients to achieve resolution, ideally without having to start Court proceedings. In our experience, the majority of claims are settled by negotiation and/or mediation.

We have successfully negotiated settlements which include both a financial and non-financial element, the latter often seeming to be more valuable to RPs. This could include removing certain council management rights, amending the transfer agreement to enhance the RPs nomination provisions and financial payments in the event of asset sales.

Many stock transfer agreements now include warranties of 30 years duration from the date of transfer and as a result, RPs should actively review their transfer agreements to assess any breaches. Failure to claim for breaches within the standard 12 years limitation period will prevent an RP from successfully pursuing a claim.

For more information

If you wish to discuss your position, or suspect your council may be in breach of a warranty or indemnity please contact Hilary Harrison.

Standard of proof in suicide cases
Standard of proof in suicide cases

A long-awaited decision of the Court of Appeal has clarified that a lower standard of proof should apply than previously thought before an Inquest can return a conclusion of suicide.

Managing absenteeism in education
Managing absenteeism in education

In a challenging economic climate with continuing budget cuts and increasing expectations of staff, sickness absence remains an ongoing problem that is important to address.

Contract management pitfalls
Contract management pitfalls

Social housing providers will routinely have a number of construction projects underway at any one time. It is essential for client teams to understand and avoid key contract management pitfalls.