Many LSVT Registered Providers (“RPs”) have come of age – or will soon be coming of age -after delivering their offer document promises. This provides RPs with the perfect platform to start to work towards a more mature, business like, relationship with their transferring council.
A potential hurdle to this fundamental development step is any outstanding financial liability owed to the RP by the councils under the stock transfer agreement. As part of the stock transfer process, councils provide various warranties and/or indemnities in favour of the RP; most notably dangerous substances, including asbestos. What steps can, and should, an RP take when a warranty is found to be inaccurate, or breached, or an indemnity limit reached?
Understandably, many RPs are reluctant to ‘rock the boat’ due to the need for a continued working relationship with their council on issues such as planning consent for planned development. However, can RPs realistically ‘look the other way’ when a potential claim exists with the consequential financial implications for the organisation?
Stepping out of a council’s shadow by bringing such a claim will inevitably cause some friction; however, the appropriate management of claims can ensure that a working relationship with the council is maintained.
With our substantial stock transfer and RPs governance experience we often advise upon, and manage, claims arising out of stock transfer warranties and indemnities. We work with clients to achieve resolution, ideally without having to start Court proceedings. In our experience, the majority of claims are settled by negotiation and/or mediation.
We have successfully negotiated settlements which include both a financial and non-financial element, the latter often seeming to be more valuable to RPs. This could include removing certain council management rights, amending the transfer agreement to enhance the RPs nomination provisions and financial payments in the event of asset sales.
Many stock transfer agreements now include warranties of 30 years duration from the date of transfer and as a result, RPs should actively review their transfer agreements to assess any breaches. Failure to claim for breaches within the standard 12 years limitation period will prevent an RP from successfully pursuing a claim.
If you wish to discuss your position, or suspect your council may be in breach of a warranty or indemnity please contact Hilary Harrison.
With lockdown restrictions further lifting on 4 July, charities have a lot to think about.
We have advised a number of families, alongside Ms Ockenden’s review, in relation to concerns as to the care and treatment provided by maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals Trust.
On 25 June 2020, the Charity Commission issued a regulatory alert to all leaders of large or complex service-providing charities.
The online divorce system is a fantastic facility available to both legal professionals and litigants in person.
The Government has confirmed that the eviction ban/possession stay will definitely end on the 23 August 2020.
AGM season will soon be upon us. One of the many challenges social distancing measures has presented is how to hold AGMs and other General Meetings.
The MHCLG has published its review into the risks of fraud and corruption in local government procurement.
On 24 April 2020, the Fire Brigade Union, supported by the prison staff union (POA), public services union PCS and the GMB, filed court proceedings against the Government.
Procurement Policy Note (PPN) 05/20 announced the Government’s update of its “Outsourcing Playbook”.
Last week saw a significant easing of social distancing measures in England from 4 July”.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.