The Law Commission published its report on Technical Issues in Charity Law in September 2017 following a public consultation.
For details, see UK response to Commission's proposed new EU procurement Directive.
Negotiations within the EU on the draft Directive are progressing and on 19 October the Commission issued a revised draft. The Cabinet Office expects the Directive to be in its final form by early 2013, with UK law adopting the rules coming into force by mid-2014.
This e-briefing updates readers on the key changes to the proposals as the negotiations have progressed, and how these are likely to affect local authorities, registered providers of social housing, ALMOs and other contracting authorities.
The original proposal was that each EU member state would be required to set up a body responsible for overseeing the EU procurement rules, with power to review procurement decisions. We suggested in our previous e-briefing that such an “oversight body” would become an alternative route, outside the courts, for contractors to challenge procurement decisions. At that stage, it looked as though the EU procurement rules were going to be enforced by a regulator with “teeth”. However, following lobbying by the UK and other EU member states, this proposal has now been dropped.
Competitive procedure with negotiation
There have been some changes to the availability of the “competitive procedure with negotiation”, which is proposed to replace the negotiated procedure. In response to criticisms that the EU procurement rules are too inflexible, the Government has pushed in the negotiations for competitive dialogue and this new competitive negotiation procedure to be made more widely available. The current proposal means that either of these procedures will be able to be used for any contracts that go beyond “off the shelf” purchasing. The Regulations include a number of examples of contracts that are regarded as being not “off the shelf”. These include construction contracts for “non-standard buildings”, construction contracts which involve design or innovative solutions and supplies and services contracts that require the adaptation or design of supplies or services. It remains to be seen how widely the courts will interpret this, as potentially this wording could encompass any works or services contracts.
Prequalification checks at end of process
The significant changes that are proposed to prequalification are likely to go ahead. These include allowing bidders to “self-declare” that they meet the minimum prequalification requirements. Only the winning bidder will have to prove they meet a contracting authority’s minimum requirements at the end of the process. This proposal has been backed by the Government, and has received widespread support in the negotiations. As we said earlier, whilst this proposal may be helpful in reducing administration, it is likely to increase the risk of challenge where a contractor “wins” the contract but is then deselected for failing to meet the authority’s minimum prequalification criteria.
Availability of procurement documents
Our previous e-briefing highlighted the fact that the proposed new rules will require all “procurement documents” (including the contract documents) to be made available on the internet from the date of the OJEU notice. This requirement appears unchanged in the revised draft. It means that contracting authorities will need to ensure that all procurement and contract documentation is ready before placing the OJEU notice. While this is good practice, at present it does not always happen. It is also difficult to see how this will work in procedures like competitive dialogue where the documentation is developed throughout the procurement process.
Contracting authorities will also have to move to 100% electronic tendering by mid 2016. While the Government supports 100% e-procurement, it is still arguing that such an absolute deadline may not be achievable.
Part A/Part B Services
The proposal for the full EU tendering procedures to apply to Part B Services, although opposed by the Government, is supported by a majority of member states. As a compromise, the Commission has suggested maintaining a “light-touch” regime for a wider range of services, such as grounds maintenance, site security, agency staff and legal services. The Government is keen to ensure this is as “light” as possible and extends to as wide a range of services as possible. However, potentially this could mean that there are three separate regimes:
- one for the current and any new Part A services;
- one for Part B services other than health and social care; and
- one for health and social care and any other services that eventually fall within the proposed “light-touch” regime.
Although 2014 may seem some way off, contracting authorities must begin to adapt their procurement processes so that they will be fully compliant with the new regime in time. This process needs to begin as soon as the text of the new Directive has been finalised.
For more information
For help with this, or advice on EU procurement issues generally, please contact Andrew Millross on 0121 212 7473 or email@example.com or any member of our Procurement and Construction team.
Changing charitable purposes and amending governing documents.
Charity registration financial thresholds.
One of the stated aims of the Green Paper is “to deliver the best commercial outcomes with the least burden on the public sector".
The proposals concerning dynamic purchasing systems (DPS) and framework agreements are the most disappointing aspect of the Green Paper.
Family team partner, Elizabeth Wyatt, is delighted to congratulate Kadie Bennett for attaining Resolution Specialist Accreditation in both children law - private and complex financial remedy matters.
On 11 February 2021, the Pension Schemes Act 2021 was given royal assent, setting out a framework for several major changes that will certainly be of interest to employers and pension funds alike.
Matthew Wort, partner, speaks on today’s Supreme Court judgment for sleep-in shifts.
The Supreme Court has today (19 March 2021) handed down judgment in the cases of Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake and Shannon v Rampersad (t/a Clifton House Residential Home).
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.