The European Court has upheld the long-standing principle that parties to a dispute should be able to choose their lawyers without having to go through a tender process (or use a framework).
A sizeable North Lincolnshire social housing provider has learnt the hard way that, whilst honesty is the best policy, it does not mean you’ll evade the consequences of your actions.
Part of a group structure under an unregistered parent company, Ongo Partnership Limited, Ongo Homes has around 10,000 homes and participates in the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS). Ongo Homes self-referred to the Regulator for Social Housing (the Regulator) in 2018 after a departing executive was granted early access to their pension, resulting in a significant cost to Ongo Homes.
The Regulator investigated the matter and found evidence of weaknesses in Ongo Homes’ governance, and particularly in the oversight and risk management of their Board. Whilst the decision to grant early access to the pension did not sit with Ongo Homes, the cost incurred did – Ongo Homes is the participating body in the pension scheme, not Ongo Partnership who made the decision. The Regulator found that there were sufficient links with the parent company’s board for Ongo Homes to be aware of what was going on and to trigger the controls and mechanisms in place to manage these types of risks. Their failure to do so has resulted in the downgrading of Ongo Homes to a non-compliant G3 grade. In the words of the Regulator, this means “the provider does not meet our governance requirements. There are some issues of serious regulatory concern and in agreement with us the provider is working to improve its position”.
These are damning words indeed, and we wait to see how this downgrading will affect Ongo Homes’ fortunes in the coming months. Regulatory downgrades can have an impact on financial covenants, making borrowing more expensive.
The following learnings can be taken from Ongo Homes’ misfortune:
- Do not assume that decisions made by a parent company or other member of a group structure will not affect your business;
- Take particular care where both a parent and a subsidiary employ staff and consider the implications for both entities;
- Substantial pension costs are likely to attract the eye of the regulator and take care when making decisions involving granting extra pension benefits, and after taking relevant advice;
- Stay interested and involved in a group structure and be prepared to speak up and trigger necessary mechanisms if concerned; and
- Despite Ongo Homes carrying the can for this, always be prepared to self-refer to the regulator; pro-active notification is always preferable to reactive response.
For more information, please contact Doug Mullen.
On 8 July, news broke of the staggering fine of more than £183m the ICO intended to levy against British Airways as a result of a hack that took place in 2018, compromising 500,000 customers' data.
The Government has been refused permission to appeal a decision ruling that transitional arrangements in public sector pension schemes are discriminatory.
The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
Many local authorities have assessed that a trading subsidiary or trading structure could be beneficial as part of generating income or the service delivery matrix.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
The Government has resurrected its plans to cap the termination payments for exiting employees in the public sector.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.