The Government has announced its intention to lift the shielding requirement for extremely vulnerable people. Katherine Sinclair and Libby Hubbard discuss...
The recent £1.5 million fine imposed on BUPA Care Homes, following the death of a resident from Legionnaires disease, demonstrates the increased risk of substantial fines and emphasises the need for organisations within the sector to ensure compliance with their health and safety obligations.
Fines for safety-related offences have increased substantially since the Health and Safety Sentencing Guidelines came into force on 1 October 2016. These guidelines ask judges to consider the harm caused by the breach, the culpability and turnover of the offender and any aggravating and mitigating factors, in order to determine an initial level for the fine. The fine is then adjusted if necessary to ensure it is proportionate to the means and circumstances of the offender.
On the third anniversary of the guidelines’ implementation, the Sentencing Council reviewed their impact. In the ten months before the guidelines coming into force, the average fine was £40,500, and only 17% of those organisations sentenced received a fine over £60,000.
In the ten months after implementation, the average fine rose to £221,700, and 51% of organisations sentenced received a fine over £60,000.
On 1 October 2019, new general sentencing guidelines were introduced, which will increase the likelihood of significant fines in a range of cases including Fire Safety and CQC prosecutions.
The Court of Appeal judgment of R (upon the prosecution of Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Health and Safety) v BUPA Care Homes Ltd demonstrates some of the key points the court will consider when sentencing health and safety offences and reinforces the increased risk of substantial fines within the health and social care sector.
The key points raised by the court were:
- A judge has the flexibility to consider a range of different factors when deciding the initial level for the fine, including the culpability of the defendant.
- The residents of the home were exposed to the risk of harm by exposure to Legionella as a result of many failures by the Defendant over a number of years.
- The court must consider the economic realities of the organisation in order to determine whether the fine needs to be adjusted. The Court of Appeal restated that the finances of linked organisations should only be considered in exceptional circumstances, which will be judged on a case-by-case basis. The court found that there were no exceptional circumstances here as the Defendant was seemingly able to pay the fine and operate as a going concern without the parent company’s support.
Whilst the Defendant’s fine in the above case was reduced, it is still a significant fine given the size of the Defendant and the nature of the offence.
Health and social care organisations need to ensure that they understand their specific health and safety duties in respect of each element of their operations. These duties can often be wide-ranging and, in some cases, overlapping.
Duties that may give rise to criminal prosecution include those arising under Health and Safety, Fire Safety and Food Safety legislation as well as the requirement to ensure safe care and treatment under the Health and Social Care Regulations.
Once organisations understand their duties, they need to ensure that they carry out suitable and sufficient risk assessments as well as implement policies, measures and precautions to comply with their obligations.
If an incident does occur, it is essential to take early advice to ensure that a case strategy can be formed as soon as possible.
For more information
The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 has now received Royal Assent. It applies to most companies as well as Limited Liability Partnerships.
The latest development in the long history of sodium valproate was the publication of The Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review today
Failure to provide minimum pension contribution protection following a TUPE transfer can end up costing a lot more than if provision had been made.
More than 700 people were consulted about their experiences of pelvic mesh, Primodos and an epilepsy drug called Sodium Valproate.
Making an application to the Court of Protection to make or change a Will for someone who is not able to do this themselves due to lacking mental capacity.
The online divorce system is a fantastic facility available to both legal professionals and litigants in person.
In a comprehensive judgement, the High Court rejected a challenge by Stagecoach to the procurement of new franchises for the South Eastern, East Midlands and West Coast rail lines.
With lockdown restrictions further lifting on 4 July, charities have a lot to think about.
We have advised a number of families, alongside Ms Ockenden’s review, in relation to concerns as to the care and treatment provided by maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals Trust.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.