The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
The recent £1.5 million fine imposed on BUPA Care Homes, following the death of a resident from Legionnaires disease, demonstrates the increased risk of substantial fines and emphasises the need for organisations within the sector to ensure compliance with their health and safety obligations.
Fines for safety-related offences have increased substantially since the Health and Safety Sentencing Guidelines came into force on 1 October 2016. These guidelines ask judges to consider the harm caused by the breach, the culpability and turnover of the offender and any aggravating and mitigating factors, in order to determine an initial level for the fine. The fine is then adjusted if necessary to ensure it is proportionate to the means and circumstances of the offender.
On the third anniversary of the guidelines’ implementation, the Sentencing Council reviewed their impact. In the ten months before the guidelines coming into force, the average fine was £40,500, and only 17% of those organisations sentenced received a fine over £60,000.
In the ten months after implementation, the average fine rose to £221,700, and 51% of organisations sentenced received a fine over £60,000.
On 1 October 2019, new general sentencing guidelines were introduced, which will increase the likelihood of significant fines in a range of cases including Fire Safety and CQC prosecutions.
The Court of Appeal judgment of R (upon the prosecution of Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Health and Safety) v BUPA Care Homes Ltd demonstrates some of the key points the court will consider when sentencing health and safety offences and reinforces the increased risk of substantial fines within the health and social care sector.
The key points raised by the court were:
- A judge has the flexibility to consider a range of different factors when deciding the initial level for the fine, including the culpability of the defendant.
- The residents of the home were exposed to the risk of harm by exposure to Legionella as a result of many failures by the Defendant over a number of years.
- The court must consider the economic realities of the organisation in order to determine whether the fine needs to be adjusted. The Court of Appeal restated that the finances of linked organisations should only be considered in exceptional circumstances, which will be judged on a case-by-case basis. The court found that there were no exceptional circumstances here as the Defendant was seemingly able to pay the fine and operate as a going concern without the parent company’s support.
Whilst the Defendant’s fine in the above case was reduced, it is still a significant fine given the size of the Defendant and the nature of the offence.
Health and social care organisations need to ensure that they understand their specific health and safety duties in respect of each element of their operations. These duties can often be wide-ranging and, in some cases, overlapping.
Duties that may give rise to criminal prosecution include those arising under Health and Safety, Fire Safety and Food Safety legislation as well as the requirement to ensure safe care and treatment under the Health and Social Care Regulations.
Once organisations understand their duties, they need to ensure that they carry out suitable and sufficient risk assessments as well as implement policies, measures and precautions to comply with their obligations.
If an incident does occur, it is essential to take early advice to ensure that a case strategy can be formed as soon as possible.
For more information
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
One change proposed by the Building Safety Bill is the introduction of a duty holder regime, which will see statutory responsibility for the safety of higher risk buildings placed on key individuals
Throughout this pandemic, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been publishing various “Statements on Coronavirus” (Statements) which provide guidance on consumer rights during this time.
A recent increase in COVID-19 cases in the UK means new measures are being put in place in an effort to reduce the risk of a second wave. Whilst the impact of COVID-19 continues to be felt, it is important to remain focused on the sector’s road to recovery.
Sometimes half an hour at a conference gives you the reality that has been staring you in the face all along. That was my experience watching “Change is on the Horizon”
Following our recent e-briefing on Possession Notices, Helen Tucker and Emilie Pownall from our housing litigation team discuss the impact of the changes on social landlords.
Not only has the possession stay been extended until 20 September, the notice periods to be given to tenants has been extended in certain circumstances with some important exceptions.
The Court has confirmed that a party cannot withhold its consent in order to re-write the original bargain.
Following the Grenfell Tower tragedy, building safety continues to be a key concern for social housing providers and their residents.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.