Eventually, the board split into two factions on a broadly generational basis. The older trustees felt the expanded hall should be treated as part of the gurdwara and should not be used for activities involving dancing or the consumption of meat. The younger trustees believed the premises should be treated as a new community building and should welcome community events even where they involved activities – such as dancing or eating meat - which were not permitted in the gurdwara itself.
Jamie tried to maintain an impartial role, working to bring the two groups together. He drew their attention to a dispute resolution procedure in the deed of trust under which the gurdwara was established which provided for internal disputes to be resolved by a ‘Holy Saint’ recognised under the particular variant of Sikh faith followed by the Totnes gurdwara as a spiritual leader of the charity. The Holy Saint was able to appoint or remove trustees and was therefore, well placed to make and enforce a binding decision.
Unfortunately, the trustees could not agree on the identity of the Holy Saint. The original Holy Saint had died years earlier and the identity of his successor was the subject of a longstanding doctrinal dispute between adherents of the Indian group from which the charity had emerged. Matters deteriorated and Jamie was shocked to receive a letter from a firm of solicitors instructed by four of his fellow trustees suggesting that the matter would have to be settled in court.
At this stage, Jamie sought legal advice. He was advised that the threatened legal action amounted to ‘charity proceedings’ and could not be pursued without permission from the Charity Commission or the Court – which had not been obtained. Both the Charity Commission and the Court would be reluctant to see the charity’s funds dissipated in the costs of litigation unless satisfied that the matter could not be settled by internal dialogue or mediation. Moreover, the Court was unlikely to be willing to intervene in a dispute which was so dependent on the particular religious beliefs and practices of the Totnes Gurdwara. A similar situation had been considered in the case of Khaira and others v Shergill and others[1] in which the Court of Appeal held that a dispute of this sort was not one that English courts could adjudicate on.
Armed with this advice Jamie persuaded the trustees to agree to mediation facilitated by a respected senior member of the local Sikh community - and he hopes it will be successful.
Please contact Shivaji Shiva on 0121 212 3681 or shivaji.shiva@anthonycollins.com.
[1] Kharia and others v Shergill and others [2012] EWCA Civ 983. At the time of writing, the Supreme Court had been approached for permission to appeal this decision.
Aside from the COVID-19 pandemic, a key theme of 2020 has been diversity and inclusivity. This two-part update addresses this theme in detail
Covid-19 has resulted, on the whole, in a marked co-operation between contracting authorities and their suppliers as everybody focuses on maintaining delivery as far as possible.
Employment Tribunal rules in favour of claimants in minimum wage case – has the interpretation of “working time” changed?
As we enter a recession, we have been here before, and a key question is what did we learn and how can we benefit from that learning?
It is anticipated that as lockdown restrictions ease, and particularly with children and young adults returning to education, cases of meningitis will start to rise.
As we continue to emerge from lockdown measures and deal with local measures and the short and long term economic impact of Covid-19, local authorities will need to re-assess how services will be delivered for years to come.
The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
One change proposed by the Building Safety Bill is the introduction of a duty holder regime, which will see statutory responsibility for the safety of higher risk buildings placed on key individuals
Throughout this pandemic, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been publishing various “Statements on Coronavirus” (Statements) which provide guidance on consumer rights during this time.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.