During the Covid-19 pandemic, much of the focus has been on shoring up existing delivery and, where possible, extending arrangements if it is not possible to re-procure.
Ann Houghton and Rankeshwar Batta were involved in a landmark case this year which addressed parental responsibility to supervise a child injured in a road accident caused by another person.
In a change from our usual work representing the injured party, Ann and Rankey successfully defended a mother joined as a co-defendant to her child’s compensation claim.
We became involved when the insurer of the defendant – a speeding driver – alleged the child’s mother was to blame for the life-changing injuries her son suffered when he was hit by the driver, because she allowed him to play in a nearby park without an adult. This, they alleged, amounted to a negligent failure to care for her son. This argument had not been tested in the court before and, if the defendant was successful, could have had very serious consequences for the child, his mother and other injured children in the future.
The potential implications for individuals, communities and society led us to take the decision to represent the defendant mother.
The facts of the case are described in more detail here.
The court dismissed the claim against our client, finding her to be “a responsible mother who took proper care” for her son’s safety. This means our client will be properly compensated for the care she has provided to her injured son over many years.
The landmark decision should also protect other children and parents in similar situations in the future: in her decision Mrs Justice Yip gave a clear warning to insurance companies to think very carefully before joining in parents as co-defendants in such cases in the future. Her decision recognised that responsible parenting comes in many forms, encompassing a range of approaches and is not based on prescriptive rules.
The case and our work has received national coverage.
For more information
The Prime Minister announced on Tuesday 22 September a new range of restrictions to protect us from the Covid crisis, some of which will apply to charities.
Following the end of the possession stay on 21 September, Helen Tucker & Rebecca Sembuuze from our housing litigation team discuss the most recent guidance, priority cases and what to expect in court.
Covid-19 has resulted, on the whole, in a marked co-operation between contracting authorities and their suppliers as everybody focuses on maintaining delivery as far as possible.
Employment Tribunal rules in favour of claimants in minimum wage case – has the interpretation of “working time” changed?
As we enter a recession, we have been here before, and a key question is what did we learn and how can we benefit from that learning?
It is anticipated that as lockdown restrictions ease, and particularly with children and young adults returning to education, cases of meningitis will start to rise.
As we continue to emerge from lockdown measures and deal with local measures and the short and long term economic impact of Covid-19, local authorities will need to re-assess how services will be delivered for years to come.
The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.