Special rules apply regarding beneficiaries where:
In such a case, if a beneficiary with an above interest sells their only home and buys a replacement that purchase may be subject to the higher rate SDLT. What is crucial is analysing whether a beneficiary had an interest in the estate’s property in the three years or more before their own chargeable transaction.
So if a beneficiary, e.g. specific beneficiary (where an interest in a house is left directly to them) or residuary beneficiary inherited an interest in a property within the THREE YEARS before a purchase of a major interest of their own, the interest in that inherited property can be ignored in calculating if they meet the higher-rate SDLT conditions in certain circumstances.
These circumstances are that the beneficiary became a joint owner of the interest by inheritance AND his and his spouse’s/civil partner’s share is no more than 50% of the whole interest in that property.
For example, a father dies and leaves the house half to his son and half to his daughter. Providing the house remains unsold and the residue was ascertained within three years then no higher SDLT would be due if the daughter sells her main residence and buys a replacement main residence in this period. She owns ‘only’ 50% and inherited it within three years of her purchase.
However, if the inherited interest is more than 50% or was inherited more than three years before the chargeable transaction, then it will count as an interest in another dwelling, and so the higher-rate SDLT will be due on the beneficiary’s own purchase.
Taking the same example as above, the son and daughter inherit their father’s house equally but they decide to retain it as an investment and residue was ascertained more than three years ago and then the daughter or son sell their main property and buy a replacement one, then there will be the higher-rate SDLT on the purchase of their own house.
To a casual observer, it might look like HMRC are discouraging people from retaining inherited property as an investment.
In terms of when the three years starts, what is important is the date that the individual becomes entitled to the interest. An interest in an administered estate is not a major interest in land, and so usually the date the individual acquired the interest is the date the interest is transferred to them. Having said this, the date will also be when the residue of an estate has been ascertained, and the PRs hold the residue of the estate for the beneficiaries absolutely. In jurisdictions where property devolves directly on heirs, the date of inheritance will be the date of death.
Once the estate receives sale proceeds, (if the PRs decide to sell the property) then the property interest ceases. So there would not be any higher rate SDLT if PRs/beneficiaries have sale proceeds in their hands instead of the actual property/interest in a property, i.e. the property is sold, before their own purchase.
If the beneficiaries sell the inherited property within three years of their own purchase, they can reclaim the higher rate SDLT already paid.
Executors and beneficiaries alike need to be aware of this potential issue.
For more information about the issues raised in this briefing, please contact us today.
It is anticipated that as lockdown restrictions ease, and particularly with children and young adults returning to education, cases of meningitis will start to rise.
As we continue to emerge from lockdown measures and deal with local measures and the short and long term economic impact of Covid-19, local authorities will need to re-assess how services will be delivered for years to come.
The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
One change proposed by the Building Safety Bill is the introduction of a duty holder regime, which will see statutory responsibility for the safety of higher risk buildings placed on key individuals
Throughout this pandemic, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been publishing various “Statements on Coronavirus” (Statements) which provide guidance on consumer rights during this time.
A recent increase in COVID-19 cases in the UK means new measures are being put in place in an effort to reduce the risk of a second wave. Whilst the impact of COVID-19 continues to be felt, it is important to remain focused on the sector’s road to recovery.
Sometimes half an hour at a conference gives you the reality that has been staring you in the face all along. That was my experience watching “Change is on the Horizon”
Following our recent e-briefing on Possession Notices, Helen Tucker and Emilie Pownall from our housing litigation team discuss the impact of the changes on social landlords.
Not only has the possession stay been extended until 20 September, the notice periods to be given to tenants has been extended in certain circumstances with some important exceptions.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.