The Lifeline Project was a well-regarded charity. Failure to carry out the targets within the contracts led the charity into insolvency and resulted in a personal, 7-year disqualification order.
The EAT decided that a warehouse worker, who had difficulty lifting up to 25kg, was disabled for the purposes of the Act.
Mr Banaszczyk worked in a distribution centre and was employed to lift and move cases by hand for loading onto pallet trucks. A long term back condition meant that he could not lift items at work of up to 25kg but was able to do other certain day to day activities, such as carry a bag of shopping. Mr Banaszczyk was dismissed on the grounds of capability as he could not achieve the standards of work set by his employer for lifting certain items.
The Employment Tribunal found that this condition did not have a substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day to day activities as its impact was limited to manual lifting of items up to 25kg at work, thus was not a ‘normal day to day activity’ for the purposes of the Equality Act. The EAT disagreed. They considered that modern UK working requires many employees to lift heavy items of up to 25kg across a range of occupations. They suggested that employers should look at the activity itself, which in this case was the lifting and moving of cases and it was clear that Mr Banaszczyk’s ability to do lifting and carrying at work was impaired because of his back condition.
The decision is surprising. There are likely to be a number of people who would struggle to lift 25kg, but would not normally be regarded as disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act. In addition, guidance to the Act on matters to be taken into account in determining disability says that an inability to move heavy objects without assistance or mechanical aid, such as moving large suitcases or a heavy piece of furniture, would not be a day to day activity.
Consequently, watch this space for a further appeal on this decision. In the meantime, employers should bear this decision in mind if an employee is struggling to perform tasks for a health related reason.
For more information
Please contact Kate Watkins for information or advice on employment issues.
On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) has launched a new scheme specifically for charities and not-for-profit organisations who want to advise EU citizens on UK settlement.
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.