In the first of a series, this article examines the impact of the Derby case on how local authorities should apply and charities can claim business rate relief.
In recent years the Probate Court Fee has been a flat fee of £155 if a solicitor submits the papers for every estate worth over £5,000 with 50p payable for every extra sealed copy of the court document the Executors need.
The Government proposes to increase these fees dramatically as follows so that the minimum fee for estates over £50,000 will be £300 increasing as follows.
- Between £300,000 and £500,000 it will be £1,000
- Between £500,000 and £1,000,000 it will be £4,000
- Between £1,000,000 and £1,600,000 it will be £8,000
- Between £1,600,000 and £2,000,000 it will be £12,000
- Over £2,000,000 the fee will be £20,000
Whilst it might seem fairer to have a system of tiered charges, based on the value of the estate – and there will of course be those that say only the very wealthiest will bear these costs, have the practical issues such as access to cash prior to the grant of probate to enable these fees to be settled really been thought through?
This fee has to be paid before the Executors can access the deceased’s funds. It is hoped that banks etc. will let the deceased’s money be used to meet these costs; if not or, as may well be the case if the deceased merely had a valuable house, there is insufficient cash, the Executors will have to borrow. Where a solicitor is used to apply for the grant of probate, it is quite common for Solicitors’ to 'front' the probate fees, recovering them as soon as the Grant of probate has been received. That is highly unlikely to continue to be possible with fees of up to £20,000. Lending money to fund the probate process could prove to be a very difficult course of action in the current climate. In the past the banks would often charge a fee as well as interest for allowing an Executors’ loan.
The Government does not propose any reliefs or remissions.
It is only a few years since the Government introduced the flat fee arguing that the Probate service was not meant to make a profit but merely break even. The Government does not explain what has changed – only to say it needs more money for IT changes.
For many this increase will be a very significant tax at what is already a very stressful time.
When won’t the charge apply?
If the asset is not in the name of the deceased when they die the tax will not be due. One option is to put in the asset in the names of “bare trustees”/nominees. In this way you still own the asset for all purposes but it can be transferred without the need for probate on death. You will need to choose your nominees very carefully and this planning should only be considered in the context of your wider plans and objectives. Any outright gift or more complex trust will have immediate tax implications as well as risk other issues.
The transfer may trigger other charges but they should not be as steep as the “Probate Tax”.
For more information
“Monitoring the Mental Health Act in 2018/19” published by the CQC, has found that although improvements have been made, healthcare services need to do more to comply with their human rights duties.
The IPPR North report says that this Parliament must be the “Devolution Parliament” to truly “level up” the country.
On 20 January 2020, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) issued Advice for Building Owners of Multi-storey, Multi-occupied Residential Buildings.
The Society for Computers and Law (SCL) has introduced an Adjudication Scheme for IT Projects and Services.
The board of a housing services company was reportedly dismissed in December 2019 following the discovery of a variety of safety and hygiene issues in the properties they manage.
The Heat Network (Metering and Billing) Regulations 2014 (the Regulations) place certain responsibilities on anyone supplying and charging for heating, cooling or hot water (the heat supplier).
In our latest Company Secretary Update, we focus on the Queen’s Speech over Christmas and the recommendations and commitments in relation to housing.
So after two days of legal argument, the Supreme Court have now retired to reach their decision in the joined cases of Tomlinson-Blake v the Royal Mencap Society and Shannon v Rampersad.
Anthony Collins Solicitors has revealed details of its annual social impact, including advising on funding deals for building 19,603 new homes and setting up 90 new charities.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.