Providers need to be alive to the risk of contractors becoming insolvent and how to limit the resulting inevitable disruption.
As we continue to await an outcome to Brexit and further certainty around new requirements in relation to building standards and fire safety requirements following on from the Grenfell tragedy, we also witness the cooling property sales market spreading beyond the South East and the continued impact of fundamental changes to the welfare state on our customers.
Housing associations must continue to deliver core functions effectively and compliantly notwithstanding the uncertainty over the standards to which will be held in the future, and doubts as to where your income and new supply of housing will come from.
The 7th annual Sector Risk Profile was published in mid-October – later in the year than previous ones, as though the Regulator held out as long as it could to see whether any of these uncertainties resolved themselves (spoiler: they didn’t).
There were no surprises in its areas of focus, nor that these were couched in the strongest terms of Board responsibility:
- Health and safety compliance – Boards are required to have strong and appropriate oversight of decisions around stock quality and health and safety compliance, and to ensure compliance with all health and safety law and regulation;
- Stock condition and asset management – anticipating the challenge to Boards will be around prioritising essential investment in existing stock against resource-hungry development and new supply, and the need for Boards to have a well-integrated strategic approach to asset management. Linked to this, registered providers (RPs) must have reliable and up-to-date data, to accurately inform both compliance positions and asset management decisions;
- Market sales exposure – a rapidly cooling outright sales market jeopardises the traditional cross-subsidy model for new supply. Boards are expected to understand their local – and the national – housing market cycle and be aware of the impact on their business and take appropriate action to avoid impairment charges that could impact on funding covenants in particular;
- Reputational risk – it is now more important than ever that Boards treasure and protect their reputation at organisation and sector level. Risks to this come in many guises – executive payoffs, health and safety failings, fraud and failures under the consumer standards;
- Rents/income – notwithstanding the end of rent reductions, Boards are urged to be careful about placing too much reliance in their business plan on assurances from Government as to rent stability over the next five years (a prescient warning given we now have a general election on 12 December that could see a new party or parties in Government for that period).
The Regulator’s expectation is that Boards are fully in control of their organisation, understand the inherent risks in all areas of their business and own the effective management and mitigation of those risks (and any consequences of not doing so).
Where things go wrong, we continue to see the Regulator treat this as a failure of governance laid at the feet of the Board. Its lack of sympathy for Boards that are not on the front foot is evident in the wording of recent regulatory reports and downgrades – early disclosure to the Regulator of any potential regulatory breaches is key, as is keeping them informed of what, when and how you are doing to fix things.
However, beware the Board that comes across the Regulator’s desk a little too often – it often views a series of seemingly minor breaches as a more significant indicator of systemic governance failure than one mighty one.
We provide support to Boards and organisations on all types of governance issues, including managing breaches and potential breaches and engagement with the Regulator. We also provide advice to organisations on how to strengthen their governance arrangements and test risk flow within their current structures.
For more information
Housing associations must continue to deliver core functions effectively and compliantly notwithstanding the uncertainty over the standards to which you will be held in the future.
Over the last few years the meaning of “asset management” has changed from being all about repairs to understanding that assets might not stay in an organisation forever.
The Grenfell Tower tragedy has understandably prompted a fundamental reconsideration of how building safety is approached for High-Rise Residential Buildings.
Results from the latest three-yearly valuation of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) are starting to trickle through.
The potential for Brexit with or without a deal causes uncertainty, and credit rating agencies do not like uncertainty.
Let’s face it, Wills are underappreciated and often overlooked. In fact, around 54% of the British public do not have one!
A recent case throws light on the scope of the exemption for “land transactions” from the need for an OJEU tender process.
A leaked report into maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust revealed by The Independent has been described as the “largest maternity scandal in NHS history”.
The Pensions Regulator is showing its determination to improve the prudent management of Local Government Pension funds by digging deep into the internal workings of these funds.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.