We hosted a breakfast roundtable with Insider Midlands magazine that had attendees from a range of organisations addressing housing needs in the Midlands. The discussion explored JVs in more detail.
On 17th October, the consultation closed on the draft Public Contracts Regulations 2015. As with all of the Cabinet Office consultations, we responded to this consultation.
In our response, we raised two fundamental concerns:
- We tried to persuade the Cabinet Office to delay the implementation of the obligation to make all of the procurement documents available online at the time of publication of the OJEU notice. We thought that contracting authorities were not yet ready to comply with this requirement. We also recommended that the Cabinet Office should use the intervening period obtain clarity from the Commission as to how they are expecting this provision should operate in the case of “iterative” processes such as competitive dialogue; and
- We repeated the concerns we raised earlier over the “Lord Young” reforms. We are concerned that these reforms will have the opposite effect from that which they are intended to have. We also suggested that including these provisions in Regulations implementing the new EU procurement Directive is not allowed under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 (which is the legislation under which the Regulations are made). We suggested that, if the Cabinet Office is determined to press ahead with these provisions, they should apply only to Government departments and not to local authorities or the wider “public sector”.
Some of the other points we made were:
- We said it was helpful that the numbering in draft Regulations, for the first time, mirrors the numbering of the Articles in the Directive;
- We said it would be helpful for guidance to identify how “disadvantage” is to be assessed in relation to reserving contracts for “sheltered workshops”, staffed by “disadvantaged persons” and in particular whether it can be focused on a particular area;
- We suggested amending a provision that would have made it harder to require suppliers to standardise new components to existing components;
- We agreed that guidance would be helpful in relation to Lots. We explained the complexity of assessing the most economically advantageous overall combination of tenders (MEAOCOT) where both “single lot” and “combined lot” bids are possible;
- We recommended that the ESPD “form” should be made available in sufficient time before implementation, so as to give people a chance to get used to it and understand its importance;
- We asked for further guidance on how to deal with conflicts of interest, particularly given the discrepancy between the approach of the European Ombudsman and European Court of Justice over the extent to which a conflict of interest may be “neutralised”;
- We commented that the lack of specific provisions in the Regulations enabling the direct payment of subcontractors was a lost opportunity;
- We asked for an explanation of the reason for the bizarre requirement (from the Directive) that a main contractor must provide details of its subcontractors’ legal advisers;
- We recommended that the provision which implied a term into contracts allowing them to be terminated after a “substantial modification” should apply only after a court decision that a substantial modification has occurred; and
- We suggested that detailed provisions dealing with changes to procurement procedures under the “light touch regime” should be deleted, as all that should be required was a “transparent and fair procedure”. Regulations requiring more than this were “gold plating”.
For more information
For a copy of our response to the consultation or a discussion on any aspect of the existing or proposed procurement regimes, please get in touch with any member of our procurement team including:
The decision of the Court of Appeal in The Harpur Trust v Brazel & Unison has made clear that employers can no longer legally calculate part-time holiday based on 12.07% of hours worked over a year.
Social landlords are seeing a rising number of Equality Act defences to possession proceedings. A recent Court of Appeal decision helps shift the likelihood of such defences succeeding.
On 31 July, the consultation period ended on MHCLG’s proposals for reforming the building safety regulatory system set out in the 'Building a Safer Future' document. We have submitted our response.
For decades now, fewer and fewer services provided by local authorities have been delivered directly by them. However, over the last couple of years, there are signs that this tide is changing.
The Government commissioned an independent review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 in July 2018. The outcome was published in May 2019 which highlighted areas for improvement.
In 2017, the NCVO commissioned a review of the tax reliefs available to charities. The brainchild of this review was published on 17 July 2019 in the form of the Charity Tax Commission report.
In 2014, the Charity Commission released its first guidance for charities on reporting serious incidents. The Commission has recently updated this guidance.
In the third part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by instructing changes under construction contracts.
Our spotlight piece considers the role of a Senior Independent Director and sector best practice. We also explore recent developments in case law, regulatory and data protection updates, and more.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.