Employers admitted to the LGPS should therefore review their policies on how they exercise discretions under the LGPS to ensure that the policies are up to date, achieve value for money and protect the employer’s reputation.

In the LGPS staff can retire early from the age of 55.  Even though the pension will be reduced to reflect the fact that the employee has retired early, employers have a discretion to waive that reduction.  In this situation, there will usually be a cost to the employer.  The pension fund may ask the employer to make a one off payment to the pension fund to cover the cost to the pension fund of waiving the reduction to pension benefits.  These payments can be very substantial, amounting to tens or occasionally hundreds of thousands of pounds.

There can be reputational and other costs for employers as well.  The fall-out from allowing early retirement and waiving reductions to pension benefits can include criticism from regulators if they take the view that the employer has failed to manage the risks of early retirement appropriately.

All employers admitted to the LGPS are required to have a policy governing how they will exercise certain discretions in the LGPS.  This policy must include a statement on when staff will be allowed to retire flexibly and when actuarial reductions may be waived.  Given changes to the regulations governing the LGPS from 1 April, all LGPS employers should be taking this opportunity to review their policies on the exercise of discretions to ensure that they appropriately manage the risks to the employer.  Employers are required by the new LGPS regulations to provide a new policy statement by 1 July 2014.

For more information

For advice on reviewing your LGPS discretions policy or more generally in relation to early retirement or the LGPS, contract Doug Mullen on 0121 212 7432 or douglas.mullen@anthonycollins.com.

Is £400m enough?
Is £400m enough?

The government announced on 16 May that it will provide a fund of £400m to cover the costs of removal and replacement of cladding to high rise residential blocks which have failed tests.

The problems with co-owned properties and attorneys
The problems with co-owned properties and attorneys

Whilst some people are under the impression that preparing a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is simply a case of completing a form and ticking a few boxes, it is about far more than this.

What's mine is (not) yours!
What's mine is (not) yours!

A big fear for some people facing divorce and the inevitable carving up of the matrimonial assets. They seek assurances that such assets will be “ring-fenced” and retained for them.

How to avoid the PET trap
How to avoid the PET trap

When an individual is thinking about making a gift to another individual, consideration needs to be given to the Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) trap.

Fictitious divorces
Fictitious divorces

Arising from the recent Family Division announcement, people who think they are legally divorced may in fact still be married.