It can be challenging to know how much information to include: if you record too much you risk wasting significant time and administrative costs, as well as overwhelming the reader. Fail to include enough information and the reader will not learn anything meaningful about the Board’s effectiveness or decision-making process and important information which supported a decision could be overlooked.
In this briefing, we discuss why board minutes are key to demonstrating successful governance and how to ensure your board minutes evidence a true record of the organisation’s decision-making.
There is a straightforward legal obligation on directors to create and store board minutes*. However, there are no legal requirements that dictate the level of detail to be recorded within the board minutes†.
The purpose of board minutes is to provide an accurate record of the business that takes place during a board meeting. Therefore, the primary concern for directors ought to be that the board minutes reflect how they (collectively) complied with their fiduciary and legal duties when reaching their decisions. Directors must exercise independent judgement, reasonable care, skill and diligence. In addition to this, they should avoid conflicts of interest, declare any interest in proposed transactions and not accept benefits from third parties in the process. Board minutes are the record which demonstrate how the directors have properly fulfilled the position of trust they hold with the organisation and towards its members or shareholders.
Ideally, board minutes will demonstrate that the Board has acted in good faith, in the best interests of the organisation and that the directors do not have any personal interests. More broadly, board minutes should offer transparency to the organisation and its members; they can also be a useful tool for reflecting on strategic decisions and ‘lessons to be learned’.
To establish whether the board minutes are well drafted, the company secretary (or the directors responsible if there is no company secretary) should consider whether an independent third party could easily establish the following:
If it is not possible to answer the above with certainty, this may cast doubts regarding the Board’s (or individual directors’) competence and the exercise of their duties. Such doubts could include whether a decision has been made without sufficient information being made available, whether they were misinformed or deliberately misled, or even whether the decision was validly passed.
Directors are not expected to act perfectly and mistakes may be made, but it is important that the minutes can evidence that the Board and individual directors acted with the reasonable diligence expected of someone with their knowledge, skills and experience (based on both the standard reasonably expected of a person carrying out the director’s functions and somebody with the same specialist knowledge as the director in question). This does not mean that meetings should be recorded word-for-word or drafted from a position of fear, but they should provide an accurate summary of the discussion and demonstrate that board members have exercised their discretion properly and not just “rubber-stamped proposals” put to them by the executive team.
Each organisation will have its own preferred way of delegating authority, based on the expertise of its executive team and governance arrangements but there are common themes that occur when it comes to applying good governance principles. When drafting effective board minutes in support of your arrangements, our practical tips are as follows:
If you would like more information on the above or wish to discuss governance arrangements within your own organisation, please contact Emma Watt.
Citations
* Section 248 Companies Act 2006
† Useful guides on board minutes include: ICSA’s ‘The practice of minuting meetings’ and the FRC’s UK Corporate Governance Code.
Aside from the COVID-19 pandemic, a key theme of 2020 has been diversity and inclusivity. This two-part update addresses this theme in detail
Covid-19 has resulted, on the whole, in a marked co-operation between contracting authorities and their suppliers as everybody focuses on maintaining delivery as far as possible.
Employment Tribunal rules in favour of claimants in minimum wage case – has the interpretation of “working time” changed?
As we enter a recession, we have been here before, and a key question is what did we learn and how can we benefit from that learning?
It is anticipated that as lockdown restrictions ease, and particularly with children and young adults returning to education, cases of meningitis will start to rise.
As we continue to emerge from lockdown measures and deal with local measures and the short and long term economic impact of Covid-19, local authorities will need to re-assess how services will be delivered for years to come.
The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
One change proposed by the Building Safety Bill is the introduction of a duty holder regime, which will see statutory responsibility for the safety of higher risk buildings placed on key individuals
Throughout this pandemic, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has been publishing various “Statements on Coronavirus” (Statements) which provide guidance on consumer rights during this time.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.