Would you know how to manage an escalating social media storm? Are you confident in your plans and policies for responding to, and managing, a prominent ‘scandal’ in your charity?
As recent decisions have demonstrated, where a breach of a consumer standard has not been met and there is a consequential finding of serious detriment, the HCA will consider the compliance of the registered provider (“RP”) with the Governance standard.
In line with proposed revisions to the Governance and Financial Viability Standard (which are currently under consultation), the Review states that RPs which become aware of a breach of a consumer standard that has resulted (or could result) in serious detriment should communicate this to the HCA in a timely way.
Statistics; The statistics provided in the Review suggest that over the last two years although there have been 509 complaints, 407 did not fall within the HCA remit, 40 escalated to Stage 3 but after further investigations only three of those had published findings of serious detriment. Thus suggesting that RPs may need to review their complaints policies and procedures to ensure they meet the requirements of the Tenant Involvement and Empowerment Standard and also ensure they are more widely publicised to tenants.
The statistics also confirm that the Home Standard continues to be the standard which is the one that is most often referred to the HCA, although there is a notable increase in the number of cases where the Tenant Involvement and Empowerment Standard is relevant either on its own or in addition to other standards.
The serious detriment test
The HCA’s role is limited in relation to the consumer standards to intervening only where failure to meet a consumer standard could lead to risk of serious harm to tenants and/or others (the ‘serious detriment test’). Where an RP has breached a consumer standard, before intervening the HCA must establish that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that:
- the failure has resulted in a serious detriment to the RP’s tenants (or potential tenants); or
- there is a significant risk that if no action is taken by the HCA, the failure will result in a serious detriment to the RP’s tenants (or potential tenants).
This process consists of three stages:
- Stage 1 – an initial review to see whether the matter falls within the HCA’s remit;
- Stage 2 - more detailed consideration as to whether there is an actual or potential breach which has caused, or could cause, serious harm; and
- Stage 3 – a detailed investigation.
The HCA’s response (including any enforcement action) will depend on the specific facts and circumstances.
Findings of serious detriment
The three findings of serious detriment relate to RPs who had not met their obligations under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998 to have a registered gas safe engineer carry out annual gas checks.
In each of the three cases, the HCA in deciding whether there had been a breach of the standard took into account how many tenants were affected, for how long and whether the failings were systematic in nature. Having established the breach, the HCA then considered “serious detriment” and in those cases where the landlord had been “taking all reasonable action to gain access (including court action)” it considered that the threshold had not been met.
These cases demonstrate:
- the importance of RPs maintaining fit for purpose gas safety programmes and data systems;
- the need for timely action to gain access;
- the use of legal routes available to ensure that the needs of the individual tenant are balanced against the safety of others nearby;
- the importance of clear policies and procedures in relation to gas safety
- awareness and training.
For more information
The Civil Partnership (Opposite-Sex Couples) Regulations 2019 were made on 5 November 2019 and came into force on 2 December 2019.
HMRC’s approach to underpayment of the National Minimum Wage (NMW) is getting tougher and shows no sign of abating.
Now 2020 is here and we have welcomed in the new decade, it’s time to welcome in changes regards the contents of employee’s statement of particulars.
In December 2019, the Care Quality Commission brought its first prosecution against a local authority
The CIL was introduced under the Planning Act 2008 and the CIL Regulations 2010, which came into force in April 2010. CIL is a non-negotiable tax charged by local authorities on new developments.
The Court of Appeal’s recent decision is likely to be unwelcome news for any cash-strapped councils seeking to fund the costs of taxi enforcement through licence fees.
It is important that trustees are aware of the law relating to people who are transgender and those who identify as non-binary so that they can ensure compliance.
Earlier this year, the Charity Commission published its inquiry report into Oxfam GB, following allegations about events in Haiti in 2010 involving its staff members.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.