On 23 July, trainees from Anthony Collins Solicitors will host an ‘experience day’, which will involve various activities and presentations, with lawyers and non-lawyers from across the firm.
This quarter the key highlights are:
1. Charity Commission announces changes to the annual return
The changes will apply from the 2015 financial year end and will include three new question areas - money received from the government and grants, policies on staff pay, and the review of financial controls. This announcement follows a full consultation on proposed changes - a summary of the consultation responses can be found here.
The controversial requirement for charities to outline their campaigning expenditure has not been implemented but is still on the agenda for the 2016 changes. We’ll provide an overview of the new rules on political campaigning by charities in our next update in February 2015.
2. Changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code
The UK Corporate Governance code (“the Code”) is one of two main codes used in the social housing sector. In September the FRC (Financial Reporting Council) issued an updated version of the Code. This follows previous consultations on directors' remuneration (October 2013), risk management, internal control and the going concern basis of accounting (November 2013), and going concern, risk management and internal control.
The main amendments include:
the introduction of a ‘viability statement’ for boards to include in the strategic report to investors to provide an improved and broader assessment of long-term solvency and liquidity;
greater emphasis being placed on Boards of listed companies ensuring that executive remuneration is designed to promote the long-term success of the company and demonstrate how this is being achieved more clearly to shareholders; and
the FRC highlighting the importance of the board’s role in establishing the ‘tone from the top’ of the company in terms of its culture and values. The directors should lead by example in order to encourage good behaviours throughout the organisation.
The changes will apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 October 2014.
3. Prosecutions brought for breaching trading disclosure requirements
The Companies Act 2006 contains trading disclosure requirements with which companies must comply (which include, for example, the display of the company name at its registered office). Since 2009, the criminal enforcement team of BIS’s Legal Services Group (which deals with criminal investigation and prosecution of allegations following referral of cases predominantly by Companies House and the Insolvency Service) has brought 5 successful prosecutions for breach of these requirements, with orders for costs of up to £1650. For the full list and further details click here.
Spotlight: Criminal Convictions of Board Members/Trustees
Over the last quarter we have received several queries from clients who have found out that a member of their Board has a criminal conviction that has caused concern to the organisation.
Although individuals with convictions can play an important role on a Board, particularly for organisations working with the criminal justice system, convictions for some offences (such as sexual offences involving children or images of such) are a big concern to our housing and community group clients, both from a safeguarding perspective and in terms of potential reputational damage to their organisation.
Recruitment processes are the most obvious place for obtaining information at the outset - the easiest way to find out if a prospective Board member has a criminal conviction is to ask them at recruitment stage. In the most recent scenarios that we are aware of, the individual has come forward and volunteered the information themselves but the timing at which this information was volunteered (perhaps because they have already been in contact with the organisation’s service users, or because they have already been formally appointed to the Board) has added to the cause for concern.
As a bare minimum, a prospective Board member should be asked to sign a declaration that they are not disqualified from acting as such (i.e. if they have an unspent criminal conviction involving dishonesty or deception, are an undischarged bankrupt or have been banned from serving as a company director).
Where Board members may actually work with children or vulnerable adults as part of their role and the organisation is legally entitled to carry out a check, you should ask the Board member concerned to consent to the obtaining of an official check through the Disclosure and Barring Service (‘DBS’) and to confirm that they will provide a copy of the certificate to the organisation once received. There are different types of checks available and the organisation should ensure that they only seek a DBS check to cover the relevant concern (e.g. children or vulnerable adults as appropriate) and that the correct level of check is obtained. An enhanced DBS check for example will disclose all (with the exception of information that is filtered out of the same) of the following:
- criminal convictions (spent and unspent);
- cautions (spent and unspent);
- police reprimands and warnings;
- other relevant police information; and
- where appropriate to the role, information held on the statutory lists of individuals considered unsuitable to work with children or vulnerable adults (barred list check - only available for those who have close and unsupervised contact with children or vulnerable adults).
To find out more about DBS eligibility click here.
Organisations should also check that their constitutional documents contain safeguards that enable organisations to obtain updated information in respect of its Board (or community panel) members (either by virtue of obtaining updated checks or by members agreeing to subscribe to the Update Service), and that enables membership to be reviewed and terminated if there is potential for reputational damage. This ensures that, where a Board member has already been appointed and the organisation is concerned, then the issue can be considered and put to the Board who can take a fully informed decision on whether or not that person may remain in that role, whether they could be moved to another role or whether their appointment should be terminated. In taking such decisions however, organisations should ensure that the individual Board member concerned gives permission to the sharing of this personal sensitive data for these purposes.
For more information
In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
A long-awaited decision of the Court of Appeal has clarified that a lower standard of proof should apply than previously thought before an Inquest can return a conclusion of suicide.
New regulations come into force on 1 June 2019, amending the Section 21 (s21) prescribed form template for use with assured shorthold tenancies.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.