In the first of a series, this article examines the impact of the Derby case on how local authorities should apply and charities can claim business rate relief.
As employer pension contributions are not received directly by an employee but paid into a pension fund, it has been established practice to exclude such payments from the calculation of a week’s pay (for example when calculating statutory redundancy pay or holiday pay). However, in University of Sunderland v Drossou UKEAT/0341/16, the EAT has upheld the employment tribunal’s decision to include employer pension contributions in the calculation of a week’s pay.
In this case, Ms Drossou was dismissed by the University on the grounds of an irretrievable breakdown in working relationships. The tribunal found that she had been unfairly dismissed and ordered compensation. When calculating Ms Drossou’s compensation, the tribunal found that a week’s pay should include employer pension contributions. Upon the University appealing the decision, the EAT agreed with the tribunal’s reasoning and confirmed that a week’s pay should include employer pension contributions.
This case alters a longstanding principle increasing the value of a statutory week’s pay under the Employment Rights Act 1996. A number of payments and remedies are based on the statutory week’s pay and, consequently, these will be increased. These include:
- Statutory redundancy payments;
- Holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations;
- Compensation under TUPE, the protective award made for failure by the employer to inform or consult; and
- Basic award and determining the upper limit on the compensatory award made for a successful unfair dismissal claim.
The implications of this decision will be of particular interest to employers who make large contributions under a defined benefit pension scheme. The average contribution to defined benefit pension schemes is 21.2% according to a 2015 ONS survey. A week’s pay for employees who participate in these schemes could, therefore, potentially, be over a fifth as much before this ruling.
There may be further litigation to challenge the validity of the EAT’s judgment but, in the meantime, employers should be aware of the adjustment to the calculations.
“Monitoring the Mental Health Act in 2018/19” published by the CQC, has found that although improvements have been made, healthcare services need to do more to comply with their human rights duties.
The IPPR North report says that this Parliament must be the “Devolution Parliament” to truly “level up” the country.
On 20 January 2020, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) issued Advice for Building Owners of Multi-storey, Multi-occupied Residential Buildings.
The Society for Computers and Law (SCL) has introduced an Adjudication Scheme for IT Projects and Services.
The board of a housing services company was reportedly dismissed in December 2019 following the discovery of a variety of safety and hygiene issues in the properties they manage.
The Heat Network (Metering and Billing) Regulations 2014 (the Regulations) place certain responsibilities on anyone supplying and charging for heating, cooling or hot water (the heat supplier).
In our latest Company Secretary Update, we focus on the Queen’s Speech over Christmas and the recommendations and commitments in relation to housing.
So after two days of legal argument, the Supreme Court have now retired to reach their decision in the joined cases of Tomlinson-Blake v the Royal Mencap Society and Shannon v Rampersad.
Anthony Collins Solicitors has revealed details of its annual social impact, including advising on funding deals for building 19,603 new homes and setting up 90 new charities.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.