Click here for the guidance: Calculating the minimum wage
The standard approach to sleep in shifts across the care sector is to pay a flat rate for a sleep in shift, rather than pay an hourly rate for each hour of the sleep in shift. This is because providers consider the requirements on staff are much less than on their staff who might be required to work a “waking night”.
In relation to time work the updated guidance provides that when addressing whether the time spent asleep counts for minimum wage purposes “it will depend on the nature of the work related obligations to which the worker is subject while asleep”. The guidance highlights that where there is a statutory requirement for the worker to be present or they would be disciplined if they left, that the time will count as working time for time work purposes. The guidance now includes a specific example of a worker in a care home who is required to be there “for health and safety purposes” although they are entitled to sleep. It provides they are likely to be working for the whole of the overnight shift, even when they are asleep.
Whilst this guidance doesn’t have any statutory authority in our view it does broadly reflect the case law on time work as it currently stands. However, we do not consider the case law reflects the intention of parliament when they introduced specific sections dealing with sleeping arrangements into the NMW legislation.
NMW compliance is calculated by taking into account relevant earnings within a pay reference period and calculating the average hourly rate received. For some providers, depending on the number of sleep in shifts their staff work in a pay reference period, if the sleep in shift is treated as time work, they may not be paying the NMW. Providers will therefore want to seek to persuade those who commission their services to increase the amount they are paid to deliver sleep in shifts. Providers will be able to remind local authority commissioners of their obligations under the Care Act and the new statutory guidance on the Care Act which makes clear their obligations to ensure providers pay the NMW. The guidance and case law is creating a significant additional financial burden on the care sector and it is in both providers' and commissioners' interests to find a solution to this issue.
As the law currently stands, the only alternative approach is for providers to look to position the sleep in arrangements as unmeasured work and put in place a daily average agreement to agree the daily average amount of hours worked during a sleep in. This builds on Court of Appeal case law in the case of Walton v Independent Living Organisation. This approach is not risk free as the case law on time work contradicts the case law on unmeasured work.
We have extensive experience of advising providers on their sleep in arrangements and defending challenges regarding NMW compliance in both the Employment Tribunal and HMRC inspections.
Please contact Matthew Wort on 0121 214 3501 or matthew.wort@anthonycollins.com to discuss these issues further.
We hosted a breakfast roundtable with Insider Midlands magazine that had attendees from a range of organisations addressing housing needs in the Midlands. The discussion explored JVs in more detail.
The decision of the Court of Appeal in The Harpur Trust v Brazel & Unison has made clear that employers can no longer legally calculate part-time holiday based on 12.07% of hours worked over a year.
Social landlords are seeing a rising number of Equality Act defences to possession proceedings. A recent Court of Appeal decision helps shift the likelihood of such defences succeeding.
On 31 July, the consultation period ended on MHCLG’s proposals for reforming the building safety regulatory system set out in the 'Building a Safer Future' document. We have submitted our response.
For decades now, fewer and fewer services provided by local authorities have been delivered directly by them. However, over the last couple of years, there are signs that this tide is changing.
The Government commissioned an independent review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 in July 2018. The outcome was published in May 2019 which highlighted areas for improvement.
In 2017, the NCVO commissioned a review of the tax reliefs available to charities. The brainchild of this review was published on 17 July 2019 in the form of the Charity Tax Commission report.
In 2014, the Charity Commission released its first guidance for charities on reporting serious incidents. The Commission has recently updated this guidance.
In the third part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by instructing changes under construction contracts.
Our spotlight piece considers the role of a Senior Independent Director and sector best practice. We also explore recent developments in case law, regulatory and data protection updates, and more.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.