The Prime Minister announced on Tuesday 22 September a new range of restrictions to protect us from the Covid crisis, some of which will apply to charities.
This means that, in certain circumstances, beneficiaries who have not received what the deceased intended may well have a legal claim against the adviser who prepared the Will.
A recent case [Herring and Hartley v Shorts Financial Services LLP] has highlighted how this principle can operate.
Facts of the case
- Mrs Shemwell, who had assets worth about £2 million, had done some estate planning with her financial adviser which involved creating some Discretionary Trusts for her niece and nephew.
- Mrs Shemwell then instructed her solicitor to make a new Will for her, ensuring that her niece and nephew would each receive a total of £200,000.
- At a meeting between Mrs Shemwell and her solicitor, Mr Sully, her financial adviser attended briefly, giving an overview of her finances but without going into detail about the trusts that had been set up. Mr Sully left before there were any discussions about the Will.
- Mrs Shemwell died shortly after making her Will. It then became apparent that one of the trusts was not as valuable as thought because Mrs Shemwell had only lent funds to the trust and not made outright gifts.
- The lawyer had not clarified details of the trusts with Mrs Shemwell and was found to be negligent for not doing so.
- In the circumstances Mr Sully, the financial adviser, was found not liable because he had not been part of the discussions about the Will, nor had he been asked for details about the trusts.
Moral of the story
It will be important for the person preparing the Will to make sure that they have full details about the client’s affairs and thoroughly check the information that they are given with the financial adviser, accountant and any other professional assisting the client.
Where the client owns property, it will be prudent to obtain copies of the deeds to be clear as to how it is owned. In an earlier case [Carr-Glynn v Frearsons] the client owned property jointly with someone else which passed automatically on her death to the surviving joint owner. The solicitor did not check to make sure that the client’s share would pass under her Will as the client wished.
Although Mr Sully (the financial adviser) was not found to have been negligent, he could have saved himself considerable time and expense if he had given clear details to the solicitor which would, hopefully, have avoided the problems altogether.
For more information
Please contact Alex Elphinston
Following the end of the possession stay on 21 September, Helen Tucker & Rebecca Sembuuze from our housing litigation team discuss the most recent guidance, priority cases and what to expect in court.
Covid-19 has resulted, on the whole, in a marked co-operation between contracting authorities and their suppliers as everybody focuses on maintaining delivery as far as possible.
Employment Tribunal rules in favour of claimants in minimum wage case – has the interpretation of “working time” changed?
As we enter a recession, we have been here before, and a key question is what did we learn and how can we benefit from that learning?
It is anticipated that as lockdown restrictions ease, and particularly with children and young adults returning to education, cases of meningitis will start to rise.
As we continue to emerge from lockdown measures and deal with local measures and the short and long term economic impact of Covid-19, local authorities will need to re-assess how services will be delivered for years to come.
The Government first announced plans for a shared ownership right to buy in October 2019. At the time the sector raised concerns about the impact the plans would have on housing associations ability to borrow. An election and a pandemic later the Government announced, during the CIH Housing Festival last week, the return of the right to shared ownership as part of its Affordable Homes Programme (AHP).
Two final pieces of the possession jigsaw have been published on 15 September 2020. Mr Justice Knowles’ working group on possession proceedings has issued its guidance on the “overall arrangements” for possession proceedings.
One change proposed by the Building Safety Bill is the introduction of a duty holder regime, which will see statutory responsibility for the safety of higher risk buildings placed on key individuals
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.