The Johnny Depp -v- News Group Newspapers trial concluded last week and has been widely publicised and reported on around the World.
Procuring organisations who have to make substantial changes to a contract during an OJEU tender process can breathe a sigh of relief. The threat of that contract being set aside for “ineffectiveness” because the changed contract has not been “advertised in OJEU” has now been removed.
The scenario is this - a contract is advertised in OJEU and substantial changes are then made to that contract during the tender process. Does this mean that the original OJEU notice no longer applies because the contract being procured is no longer the one that was advertised?
“No,” said the High Court in a recent case*. The issue here was whether a substantial change to the contract from the one that was tendered meant that the changed contract had not been advertised. This would have made it an illegal direct award and liable to be set aside for “ineffectiveness” throughout the six-months after it is entered into.
The court said that to prevent a challenge for ineffectiveness the OJEU notice just had to be “capable of being related to the procedure and contract awarded”. The fact that there had been a substantial change did not mean that the revised contract had not been let “without prior publication of an OJEU notice”.
This is welcome news. But there is a sting in the tail. The substantial change could still result in a claim for damages, for example from a contractor who has been denied the opportunity to tender for the revised contract because it has not been advertised.
If there is time to start a new procurement, then the best option is usually to do so. Where there is no time to do this, the case provides welcome reassurance that the changed contract is not at risk of set-aside because it has not been “advertised in OJEU”.
*AEW Europe LLP v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council  EWHC 2050
For more information
Please contact Andrew Millross.
On 30 June 2020, Boris Johnson announced radical changes to the planning system.
Six months after the first recorded case of COVID-19 in the UK, it is clear that charities, community organisations and volunteers have played a huge role in the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic
This article is further to our previous e-briefing (published on 22 July 2020) where we informed you that there are new temporary measures (a new Practice Direction PD55c) that have been brought into deal with possession claims, following the stay being lifted on possession claims on 22 August 2020.
A podcast from Alex Loxton and Sumi Begum from our housing litigation team, discussing injunction applications and the courts approach in light of COVID-19 and the ban on possession proceedings.
We have asked colleagues in the Employment Law team to highlight what they think is key to managing a redundancy programme well.
The use of video remote witnessing of Wills will become law.
There’s no doubt about it, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed incredible pressure on the NHS.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s £3.8 billion SDLT giveaway may bring benefits for registered providers of social housing, according to ACS experts in the sector.
We finally have some detail about what will happen after the end of the possession stay/evictions ban on 23 August 2020.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.