In the second part of our series on contract management pitfalls, we look at the risks and opportunities presented by payment mechanisms in construction contracts.
The High Court has decided that South Yorkshire firefighters working four days, and being on call for four nights, were working in breach of the Working Time Regulations and, therefore, their shift arrangements had to be reviewed.
The Working Time Regulations provide workers with the following rest periods and breaks unless they are excluded workers or exempt:
- 11 hours uninterrupted rest per day (“daily-rest period”);
- 24 hours uninterrupted rest per week or 48 hours uninterrupted rest per fortnight (“weekly-rest period”); and
- Rest breaks at work – a rest break of 20 minutes when working more than 6 hours per day.
The provisions entitling workers to 11 hours rest per day and 24 hours rest per week (or 48 hours per fortnight) do not apply for either of the following:
- Shift workers when they change shift and cannot take a daily or weekly rest period between the end of one shift and the start of the next.
- Workers whose duties involve periods of work split up over the day, such as cleaning or catering staff working split shifts.
Should workers be exempt, “compensatory rest” will usually have to be given – i.e. if a worker is required to work during a period that would otherwise have been a rest period or rest break, the employer "shall wherever possible, allow [the worker] to take an equivalent period of compensatory rest, and in exceptional cases in which it is not possible, for objective reasons, to grant such a period of rest, [the] employer shall afford [the worker] such protection as may be appropriate in order to safeguard the worker's health and safety."
South Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority (the Authority) operated a shift pattern at some fire stations known as "close-proximity crewing" (CPC), which involved a four-day shift of being on call at night. Under the Working Time Regulations, the time spent waiting or "on call" at the workplace, or at another place chosen by the employer, counts as “working time” and therefore both the daytime working and the CPC counted as working time, amounting to a continuous period of 96 hours working time. The Fire Brigade Union (the Union) brought an application for judicial review arguing that the CPC breached rest entitlements under the Working Time Regulations.
The Authority admitted that the CPC shift pattern breached the right to a daily rest period of 11 consecutive hours in each 24-hour period of work, but argued that the shift worker exemption applied.
The court found that CPC involved one continuous shift and that therefore it could not be argued that the workers could not take a break between their shifts, i.e. between the end of one shift and the start of the next. Furthermore, the Authority had failed to offer the necessary compensatory rest.
This case is another reminder that the employers’ obligations are under the Working Time Regulations regarding allowing workers rest periods and the fact that Courts are not sympathetic to employers seeking to argue an exemption under the Regulations.
For more information
We have advised a significant number of clients in both the social care sector and the housing sector on structuring their live-in care, sleep-in and on-call arrangements to ensure compliance. For a further briefing on this issue, please click here.
Under most construction contracts, the contractor takes on the ground conditions risk. However, a recent case has demonstrated that the risk can fall on the employer.
The UK Government has been consulting on how it should promote social value in its procurements. Here is our response that we submitted to the consultation...
The Tenant Fees Act 2019 came into force on 1 June 2019.
A recent case in the Court of Appeal will no doubt bring a sigh of relief for employers, but a corresponding sigh of disappointment may be uttered for equality and gender balance in the workplace.
This briefing assists response to the consultation paper by outlining the consultation questions, providing some background information and prompting some thoughts and potential answers.
A report published on 29 May by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has found that since 2009-10, local government spending on services has fallen on average by 21% in real terms.
A long-awaited decision of the Court of Appeal has clarified that a lower standard of proof should apply than previously thought before an Inquest can return a conclusion of suicide.
New regulations come into force on 1 June 2019, amending the Section 21 (s21) prescribed form template for use with assured shorthold tenancies.
In a challenging economic climate with continuing budget cuts and increasing expectations of staff, sickness absence remains an ongoing problem that is important to address.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.