Our Housing team are delighted following a formal tender procurement process to have been appointed to three lots under the new multi-million-pound legal services framework for The Riverside Group.
The charities and social businesses we work with often run into difficulties when they engage external designers to produce logos. They often fail to appreciate that where a self-employed consultant creates a copyright work for them the copyright will be owned by the consultant unless there is an agreement that copyright will be owned by the client organisation. The organisation may not own the design even though it paid for it.
In some cases, the situation is made better because although there is no express agreement about the ownership of copyright in the design, an agreement can be implied by the court. However, the scope of the implied agreement will not go further than is necessary in the circumstances. This will often leave the client organisation with no more than a licence to use the copyright work (rather than an assignment of the copyright).
Problems also arise where new opportunities for exploiting the copyright work arise after it is created. The implied licence will not extend to such new opportunities. For example, a number of charities were forced to pay their designers additional fees for the right to use logos on their websites because the design had been created before the internet was widely used, the copyright in the design had never been assigned to the charity and the charity could not prove it had the right to use the design for purposes that were not contemplated when the designer was engaged.
A number of these issues are highlighted in a recent case involving a Community Interest Company in Stoke on Trent:-
In this case, the situation was further complicated because the designer had assigned the copyright in the logos concerned in writing to another company. However, the other company was owned by a former director of Kilnworx (the CIC referred to above) and had notice of the CIC’s claim to the copyright. As a result, it took the legal interest subject to the CIC’s equitable rights to use the copyright work.
Another interesting aspect of the case is that it arose in the context of a dispute between the founders of the CIC. As is not unusual the individuals involved sought to use any available legal lever to achieve their ends or, as Judge Hacon put it (at para 31):
“I think the reality is that Atelier's current claim to the unencumbered ownership of the copyrights in the Logos is borne of the unfortunate and bad tempered split between the individuals who thought up the Kilnworx project and a wish on the part of Mr Bunting to hold Kilnworx and its remaining directors over a copyright barrel in order to recover some of what he believes to be the £45,000 or so owed to him. There is nothing intrinsically wrong in that, but the barrel has to be there. In my view it is not.”
For more information
For further information on the issues raised by this briefing note please contact Shivaji Shiva. We have produced a toolkit on Intellectual Property for charities and social businesses and Shivaji or Emma Young would be delighted to discuss that with you.
Necrotising Fasciitis, more commonly known as the ‘flesh-eating disease’, is a significant medical condition that requires urgent treatment.
Many of us who have been following the unfolding Inquest, are not surprised that the Coroner found gross and significant failures on the part of those caring for him.
Transferring out of SHPS will not be suitable for every housing association. So what should housing associations do?
In all the action to remove defective cladding, leaseholders have been the elephant in the room. Whilst social landlords might have adopted a wait and see approach private landlords do not have that luxury.
We welcome the Labour Party’s commitment to doubling the size of the co-operative economy. We wholeheartedly support the ambition to grow this vitally important part of the economy.
It was first referred to in the Charities Act 2006 (which was subsequently replaced by the Charities Act 2011) but it has finally been announced that charitable companies are able to convert to a charitable incorporated organisation (“CIO”).
The Private Members Bill Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation and Liability for Housing Standards) Bill 2017-19 now has Government support and was debated at second reading on Friday 19 January 2018.
In short - yes. This is a common question in personal injury or clinical negligence claims and has recently come before the High Court in judicial review proceedings.
GDPR The General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) will come into force on 25 May 2018 and bring changes to the rules governing data protection and the requirements placed on organisations which control or process personal data.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.