Our Housing team are delighted following a formal tender procurement process to have been appointed to three lots under the new multi-million-pound legal services framework for The Riverside Group.
We believe that every person should be:
- Treated as an individual;
- Empowered and supported to make their own decisions about their life; and
- Free from undue pressure or abuse.
Our philosophy and approach fit neatly with the principles of the MCA. However, despite its worthy aims, in practice, the application of the MCA can be patchy. There is more to learn, which is well illustrated by the recent case of CH v A Metropolitan Council  EWCOP 12.
CH was 38 years old. He was born with Downs Syndrome and also had a learning disability. He married WH in 2010, and they lived together at his parent's home. They later sought fertility treatment, which led to an assessment by a clinical psychologist who determined that CH lacked the capacity to consent to sexual relationships. A letter was sent to WH in March 2015, advising her to abstain from sexual intercourse with CH to avoid committing a serious criminal offence under Sections 30-1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. WH also understood that if she continued to have sexual relations with her husband, the local authority might remove her or her husband from the home.
WH moved into another bedroom and reduced physical displays of affection with CH – so as not 'to lead him on'. We can only imagine how distressing all of this was for CH.
What should have happened next?
Section 1(3) of the MCA provides: "A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him to do so have been taken without success." The consultant psychologist made it clear that CH needed a course of sex education, which should enable him to achieve the necessary capacity to consent to sexual relations with his wife. However, the local authority failed to provide that education for CH, despite repeated and lengthy requests. Proceedings followed in the Court of Protection; the provision of the sex education was ordered and then began in June 2016. CH made good progress in his understanding and in March 2017, CH and WH were able to resume a normal marital relationship.
Comment on the case
Although it may seem unconscionable to the reader that a committed and loving couple should have to experience this form of intrusion, Sir Mark Hedley commented:
“Logically the question of capacity must apply also to married relations and the criminal law makes no distinction between settled relations and sexual disinhibition or indeed between sexual relations within or outside marriage. Society's entirely proper concern to protect those who are particularly vulnerable may lead to surprising, perhaps even unforeseen consequences. Such, however, may be the price of protection for all.”
The initial decision made by the authorities in relation to CH and WH was made in accordance with the law. However, the failure to follow through and apply the principles of the MCA and support CH to gain understanding and acquire the necessary capacity to resume sexual intercourse with his wife breached CH’s right to a private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The local authority was required to:
- Make a formal apology to CH for the delay in providing him with the sex education; and
- Pay the sum of £10,000 in damages.
Anthony Collins Solicitors
Supporting our clients to make their own decisions is at the heart of what we do. We enjoy seeing our clients live as independently as possible.
We are marking the 10th anniversary of the MCA with a series of articles exploring different aspects of our and our clients’ experience.
This is culminating in a party – the MCA birthday party – where we will celebrate this important piece of legislation with those most important to us; our clients (aged between 5 and 92) and their families. There will be fun and games – and, of course, a birthday cake!
Necrotising Fasciitis, more commonly known as the ‘flesh-eating disease’, is a significant medical condition that requires urgent treatment.
Many of us who have been following the unfolding Inquest, are not surprised that the Coroner found gross and significant failures on the part of those caring for him.
Transferring out of SHPS will not be suitable for every housing association. So what should housing associations do?
In all the action to remove defective cladding, leaseholders have been the elephant in the room. Whilst social landlords might have adopted a wait and see approach private landlords do not have that luxury.
We welcome the Labour Party’s commitment to doubling the size of the co-operative economy. We wholeheartedly support the ambition to grow this vitally important part of the economy.
It was first referred to in the Charities Act 2006 (which was subsequently replaced by the Charities Act 2011) but it has finally been announced that charitable companies are able to convert to a charitable incorporated organisation (“CIO”).
The Private Members Bill Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation and Liability for Housing Standards) Bill 2017-19 now has Government support and was debated at second reading on Friday 19 January 2018.
In short - yes. This is a common question in personal injury or clinical negligence claims and has recently come before the High Court in judicial review proceedings.
GDPR The General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) will come into force on 25 May 2018 and bring changes to the rules governing data protection and the requirements placed on organisations which control or process personal data.
To receive invitations to our events, as well as information and articles on legal issues and sector developments that are of interest to you, please sign up to Newsroom.